Market Data Snapshot Distribution via Tiered Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing market data distribution systems consume excessive processing resources and bandwidth by transmitting all data periodically, which can lead to traders not having current and accurate price information, hindering optimal trading decisions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a tier structure for market data distribution, where data is analyzed for price changes and distributed immediately if changes occur, and aggregated with similar events until a quantity threshold is met, reducing unnecessary data transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If all market data is distributed periodically, then the amount of data transmitted is reduced, but traders do not receive current and accurate price information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth consumptionVSAvoidcurrent price information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the treatment of market data based on its significance. Price-changing events receive immediate distribution while non-price-changing events are aggregated and distributed periodically. This selective approach ensures that critical information is transmitted with high priority while less critical data consumes minimal bandwidth, resolving the contradiction between reducing bandwidth usage and maintaining information accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments market data into two distinct categories: price-changing events and non-price-changing events. This segmentation allows the system to apply different distribution strategies to different types of data, ensuring that price-sensitive information is transmitted immediately while other data can be batched, thus balancing bandwidth efficiency with information timeliness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If all market data is distributed immediately, then traders receive current information, but processing resources and bandwidth are excessively consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent price informationVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates each market data event to determine its significance, applying immediate distribution only to price-changing events while aggregating non-price-changing events. This quality-based differentiation ensures that critical information reaches traders without delay while minimizing bandwidth consumption for less critical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting market data into price-changing and non-price-changing categories, the system can apply appropriate distribution timing to each segment, ensuring timely delivery of important information while reducing overall bandwidth usage through aggregation of less critical events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of energy

If market data is aggregated and distributed periodically, then bandwidth is conserved, but traders are not alerted of relevant events in a timely manner

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth consumptionVSAvoidevent notification delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by identifying and prioritizing price-changing events for immediate distribution, while applying periodic aggregation only to non-price-changing events. This ensures that time-sensitive information is delivered without delay while still achieving bandwidth conservation for less time-critical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Segmentation of market data into time-sensitive price-changing events and less time-sensitive non-price-changing events enables the system to apply different distribution timing strategies, minimizing notification delays for critical events while maintaining bandwidth efficiency for other data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of energy

If a tier structure is implemented for market data distribution, then unnecessary data transmission is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth consumptionVSAvoiddata distribution system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tier structure implements local quality by creating different distribution channels based on data significance. The system evaluates each event's impact and routes it to the appropriate tier (immediate or aggregated distribution), reducing unnecessary transmissions while maintaining a relatively simple evaluation criterion focused on price changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10977732B1System and method for providing intelligent market data snapshots
Publication Date: 2021.04.13 CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC
  • US10977732B1 patent drawing
  • US10977732B1 patent drawing
  • US10977732B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for processing and distributing market data. Critical data, such as data showing that a market price has changed is distributed without further delay. When the market data does not result in a change in a market price or does not meet another critical criteria, the market data is aggregated with market data for similar events and distributed when the aggregated market data passes a quantity threshold.