Marking Pen With Segmented Grip And Protective Sharpener Cap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional marking devices, such as pens, face difficulties in accessing hard-to-reach areas and are prone to wear and damage due to their size and lack of robustness, making them unsuitable for precise marking tasks like drilling holes or drawing lines in construction activities.

Innovation Solution

A marking device featuring a mechanical pen with a displaceable refill and a protective cap that includes a sharpener, designed with a wide grip area and a thin neck for ergonomic handling and protection, along with a mounting bracket for secure attachment to work clothing, allowing easy access and protection during use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If an ordinary pen is used for marking, then the marking can be applied, but the pen is too wide to access hard-to-reach places like deep holes or behind wide edges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to hard-to-reach placesVSAvoidpen diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The pen is segmented into distinct functional zones: a wide grip area for ergonomic handling and a thin neck area for accessing tight spaces. This segmentation allows the pen to simultaneously provide comfortable grip and precise access to hard-to-reach locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the pen have different diameters optimized for their specific functions. The grip area has a larger diameter for comfort and control, while the neck area has a smaller diameter for accessing tight spaces. This local differentiation of geometric properties resolves the contradiction between grip comfort and access capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If a thin pen is used to access hard-to-reach places, then access is improved, but the pen lacks robustness and is subject to rapid wear and damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to hard-to-reach placesVSAvoidrobustness and wear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pen structure is segmented such that the thin neck area provides access capability while the wider grip area provides structural robustness. The refilling mechanism is integrated into the grip area, allowing easy replacement of worn refills without replacing the entire pen, thus maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pen employs a disposable refill system where the worn-out refill can be easily discarded and replaced with a fresh one. This allows the robust pen body to continue serving its purpose while the consumable refill is replaced, maintaining overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Adaptability or versatility

If a mechanical pen with displaceable refill is used, then interchangeability of lead types is enabled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterchangeability of lead typesVSAvoidactuating mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical pen design allows a single pen body to accommodate multiple types of refills (different leads, colors, diameters) through a universal interface. The displaceable refill mechanism with simple retention features enables users to switch between different refill types for different marking tasks without needing separate pens for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The refill is designed to be displaceable and repositionable within the pen body through a simple actuating mechanism. This dynamic design allows the refill to be easily advanced, retracted, or replaced, providing versatility while keeping the mechanism simple enough for user-friendly operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If the pen housing is divided into wide grip area and thin neck area, then ergonomics and accessibility are improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic handlingVSAvoidpen housing fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The pen housing is segmented into distinct grip and neck portions with clearly defined geometric boundaries. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized independently for its function while simplifying the manufacturing process through standardized forming techniques for each section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pen housing exhibits local quality variations with the grip area having larger diameter for ergonomics and the neck area having smaller diameter for access. These localized geometric differences can be achieved through conventional molding or machining techniques without requiring complex overall design, as each section's geometry is optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP1953003B1Marking device with protective cap and sharpener
Publication Date: 2013.10.02 MOECK GERHARD
  • EP1953003B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~3
  • EP1953003B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP1953003B1 patent drawingFigure 7~10

AI summary

A marking appliance has a marking pencil (2) in a housing (4) and in which the marking pencil (2) has a broad hand-grip area (9) with a thin throat-area (10). A protective cap has an interior section for partly accommodating the hand-grip area (9) and a narrow interior section for the throat-area (10) of the marking pencil (2). A fixture clip is provided on the outside of the protective cap.