Mask Defect Inspection Using Sample-Based Nuisance Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing defect inspection apparatuses struggle to effectively discriminate between defects of interest (DOIs) and nuisances in mask patterns, leading to increased processing loads due to high nuisance detection, which can be exacerbated by setting conditions for maximum sensitivity.

Innovation Solution

A defect inspection method that utilizes a defect inspection apparatus to generate a reference image based on design data, set defect detection conditions using an index from a second sample's inspection results, and discriminate nuisances based on these conditions, incorporating elements like defect categorization, grouping, sensitivity adjustment, and nuisance filtering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If defect detection sensitivity is maximized by adjusting inspection conditions, then defect detection capability is improved, but the number of nuisances detected increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection sensitivityVSAvoidnumber of nuisances detected
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary defect inspection on a first mask to collect defect data before inspecting the second mask. This preliminary action enables the establishment of defect detection conditions based on actual defect characteristics, allowing the system to differentiate between DOIs and nuisances more effectively during subsequent inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the inspection results of the first mask to adjust and set appropriate defect detection conditions for the second mask. By analyzing the defects detected in the first mask, the system refines its detection parameters to improve DOI identification while reducing nuisance detection in subsequent inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If defect detection conditions are set for maximum sensitivity, then defect detection capability is improved, but processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidprocessing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary defect inspection and analysis on a first mask to establish optimal detection conditions before conducting the actual inspection of the second mask. This preliminary characterization of defect types and patterns enables more efficient subsequent inspections with reduced processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts defect detection parameters based on the specific characteristics observed in the first mask inspection. By changing detection parameters according to actual defect patterns rather than using fixed maximum sensitivity settings, the system achieves effective defect detection with reduced processing load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple defects are detected for comprehensive inspection, then defect detection coverage is improved, but discrimination between DOI and nuisance becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection coverageVSAvoiddiscrimination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection process is segmented into distinct phases: first, a preliminary inspection of a first mask to characterize defect types; second, using this characterization to guide the inspection of a second mask with targeted parameters. This segmentation allows comprehensive defect detection while simplifying discrimination by categorizing defects based on patterns identified in the first inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection results from the first mask serve as an intermediary that mediates between comprehensive defect detection and simplified discrimination. By using the first mask's defect characteristics as a reference framework, the system can efficiently categorize and discriminate defects in the second mask without requiring complex real-time analysis of each detected defect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the ratio of nuisances detected while maintaining maximum defect detection sensitivity, aligning with user-specific discrimination criteria and reducing processing loads.

Implementation Method 1

a defect inspection apparatus that performs defect inspection on a mask by irradiating a sample with illumination light to acquire an optical image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical imaging: Light

Data Source

PatentUS12373939B2Defect inspection method
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 NUFLARE TECH INC
  • US12373939B2 patent drawing
  • US12373939B2 patent drawing
  • US12373939B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment, a defect inspection method is performed with a defect inspection apparatus. The defect inspection apparatus is adapted to irradiate a first sample with illumination light to acquire a first sample image, and compare the first sample image to a reference image to inspect a defect. The defect inspection method includes generating the reference image, acquiring the first sample image, setting a defect detection condition using an index based on a result of defect inspection of a second sample different from the first sample, and discriminating a nuisance from a result of comparison between the reference image and the first sample image based on the defect detection condition.