Mask Pattern Arrangement Using Discretized Intensity Functions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for arranging mask patterns in semiconductor fabrication fail to efficiently determine the position of additional patterns to optimize image intensity and exposure on semiconductor wafers, leading to suboptimal performance in integrated circuit fabrication.

Innovation Solution

The method involves obtaining a distribution of functions representing the contribution of a second pattern to image intensity, discretizing neighboring regions into finite regions, and determining the position of the second pattern using polygonal regions with representative values, which enhances image intensity and exposure by applying optical proximity correction and mask rule checks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If current methods for arranging mask patterns are used, then the process is simple, but the speed of determining pattern position is slow and image intensity optimization is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of determining pattern positionVSAvoidcomplexity of pattern arrangement method
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the continuous function distribution h(ξ−x) into discrete representative values h(x,ξ) at specific polygonal regions. This segmentation allows faster computation by replacing continuous function evaluation with discrete value lookup, directly improving the speed of determining pattern position while maintaining acceptable accuracy for optimization purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the representation parameter from continuous function distribution to discrete representative values at polygonal regions. This parameter change transforms the computational problem from evaluating continuous functions to comparing discrete values, significantly accelerating the pattern position determination process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If continuous function distribution is used, then accuracy is high, but computation time is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation timeVSAvoidprecision of pattern position determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the function distribution into discrete representative values at polygonal regions, the patent reduces computation time from evaluating continuous functions to comparing discrete values, while maintaining sufficient precision for determining optimal pattern positions that maximize image intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses representative values at specific polygonal regions rather than evaluating the function everywhere. This partial action approach provides sufficient precision for optimization purposes without the excessive computation time required for complete continuous function evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Illumination intensity

If more patterns are added to optimize image intensity, then exposure performance improves, but determining the position becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage intensity on semiconductor waferVSAvoidcomplexity of position determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using representative values h(x,ξ) at specific polygonal regions around each pattern. This allows efficient determination of second pattern positions that optimize image intensity at local regions, enabling multiple patterns to be arranged with improved exposure performance without excessive computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By changing from continuous function evaluation to discrete representative value comparison, the patent enables complex multi-pattern arrangements to be optimized efficiently. The parameter change allows the system to handle multiple patterns while keeping the position determination process computationally manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8341561B2Methods of arranging mask patterns and associated apparatus
Publication Date: 2012.12.25 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US8341561B2 patent drawing
  • US8341561B2 patent drawing
  • US8341561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus are disclosed that arrange mask patterns in response to the contribution of a second pattern to image intensity. In some methods of arranging mask patterns, a distribution of functions h(ξ−x) is obtained which represents the contribution of a second pattern to image intensity on a first pattern. Neighboring regions of the first pattern are discretized into finite regions, and the distribution of the functions h(ξ−x) is replaced with representative values h(x,ξ) of the discretized regions. A position of the second pattern is determined using polygonal regions having the same h(x,ξ). As described, the term x is the position of the first pattern and the term ξ is the position of the assist.