Masking Bladed Disc for Jet Engine Radar Signature Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbojet engine rotor elements contribute significantly to the radar detection of stealth aircraft, and existing methods to reduce radar detection levels of low pressure compressors are insufficient.

Innovation Solution

A masking bladed wheel with specifically designed vanes that deflect incoming electromagnetic waves, featuring convex and concave zones to minimize reflection, and optionally with variable setting flaps and electromagnetic radiation-absorbing coatings, is integrated upstream of the low pressure compressor to geometrically mask the rotor elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the inlet duct is bent to deflect radar waves obliquely incident on rotor elements, then radar reflection is reduced, but the radar detection level remains too high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradar detection levelVSAvoidinlet duct configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A masking wheel with specially shaped vanes is introduced as an intermediary component between the inlet duct and the rotor elements. The vanes are designed with convex and concave zones that work together to deflect and scatter radar waves, preventing direct reflection from the rotor elements while maintaining the existing inlet duct configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The masking wheel is divided into multiple vanes, each featuring segmented surface geometry with distinct convex and concave zones. This segmentation allows different regions of the wheel to handle different aspects of radar wave deflection, with convex zones scattering waves and concave zones providing additional angular redirection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If masking vanes with convex and concave zones are introduced to deflect electromagnetic waves, then radar signature is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradar signatureVSAvoidmasking wheel structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vanes of the masking wheel incorporate curved surfaces with defined convex and concave zones rather than flat surfaces. These curved geometries enable more effective radar wave deflection by creating continuous angular transitions that scatter electromagnetic waves in multiple directions, reducing the radar signature more effectively than flat vanes would provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Adaptability or versatility

If variable setting flaps are added to adjust vane positions, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevane position adjustmentVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The masking wheel incorporates variable setting flaps that can be adjusted to different positions, transforming the static vanes into dynamic components. This allows the system to adapt to different operating conditions and radar detection scenarios by adjusting the angular position of the flaps, thereby optimizing the radar wave deflection characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Object-affected harmful factors

If electromagnetic radiation-absorbing coatings are applied to vanes, then radar detection is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic radiation reflectionVSAvoidcoating application
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The vanes are coated with specialized electromagnetic radiation-absorbing materials to reduce radar detection. This composite approach combines the structural function of the vanes with the electromagnetic shielding function of the coating, creating a multi-functional surface that both deflects and absorbs radar waves, thereby reducing the overall radar signature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the radar detection level of the low pressure compressor by deflecting and absorbing electromagnetic waves, enhancing the stealth capabilities of the aircraft while maintaining compressor performance.

Implementation Method 1

incoming magnetic waves passing through the wheel are deflected to be obliquely incident on the wheel of the low pressure compressor so as to be faintly reflected by it

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic wave deflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

the vanes are covered with a coating absorbing electromagnetic radiations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS11993408B2Masking bladed disc for reducing the radar signature of a moving compressor moving disc of a jet engine
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US11993408B2 patent drawing
  • US11993408B2 patent drawing
  • US11993408B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bladed disc for masking a moving disc of a jet engine, including blades, each blade including a pressure-side wall and a suction-side wall that meet at a leading-edge and at a trailing edge, and wherein each blade has a pressure-side wall and a suction-side wall each including a concave zone and a convex zone that are at a distance from the leading-edge and from the trailing edge and are spaced apart from one another, these concave zones and these convex zones each extending over the majority of the height of the blade, the concave zone of the pressure-side wall is opposite the convex zone of the suction-side wall, the concave zone of the suction-side wall is opposite the convex zone of the pressure-side wall.