Mass-Balanced Control Stick for Self-Centering Without Springs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft flight control joysticks face challenges in achieving self-centering capabilities without adding weight, complexity, and cost, while also maintaining neutrality against acceleration forces like gravity and g-forces.

Innovation Solution

A control stick design that incorporates mass-balanced mechanical components, utilizing a restoring plate and compliant member to provide self-centering functionality without additional counterweights, ensuring the stick remains neutral to acceleration forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If springs are included to provide centering force, then self-centering function is improved, but weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-centering functionVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the spring component entirely from the control stick design. Instead of using a spring to provide centering force, the design relies on the natural mass balance and gravitational force acting on the control stick to return it to the neutral position, thereby eliminating the complex spring mechanism while maintaining the self-centering function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The control stick uses its own mass distribution and the gravitational field to achieve centering. By properly balancing the mass of the control stick components, the system serves itself to return to neutral position without requiring external spring mechanisms, reducing both weight and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If springs are included to provide centering force, then self-centering function is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-centering functionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the spring component from the design, which directly reduces manufacturing costs by removing the need to source, manufacture, and assemble spring elements. The centering function is achieved through the control stick's inherent mass balance properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The design replaces expensive mechanical spring components with a simpler mass-balanced structure that relies on gravitational forces, reducing the bill of materials cost and simplifying the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If mass is added for counterbalancing, then neutrality to acceleration forces is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneutrality to acceleration forcesVSAvoidcontrol stick weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric mass distribution in the control stick design. By strategically placing mass elements at specific locations along the control stick, the design achieves neutral balance and resistance to acceleration forces without adding overall weight. The mass is distributed to create the desired moment balance rather than adding uniform counterweight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The solution addresses the weight issue by transitioning from adding mass in one dimension (counterweights) to distributing mass along the length of the control stick (moment arm dimension). This allows achieving balance through spatial distribution of existing mass rather than adding additional counterbalancing mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves a self-centering control stick that is mass-balanced, reducing weight and cost, and maintains stability against gravity and g-forces, enhancing resistance to movement under acceleration without increasing weight.

Implementation Method 1

maintains stability against gravity and g-forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

mass-balanced mechanical components... neutral to forces of acceleration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Data Source

PatentEP2948368B1Passive control stick
Publication Date: 2020.01.08 WOODWARD INC
  • EP2948368B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~2
  • EP2948368B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~5

AI summary

A control apparatus includes a first mounting plate, a restoring plate having a first surface disposed adjacent the first mounting plate, and a second surface. The control apparatus also includes an elongate member that includes a first elongate portion, a second elongate portion, an axis member between the first elongate portion and the second elongate portion pivotally mounting the elongate member to the first mounting plate and defining a first axis, a displaceable force plate having a substantially flat surface disposed adjacent the second surface of the restoring plate, and a compliant member providing a biasing force between a retaining portion and the force plate against the second surface of the restoring plate. The mass of the second elongate portion substantially offsets the mass of the first elongate portion about the axis member.