Mass Spectrometry Data Quality Scoring for Compound Libraries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High throughput mass spectrometry analysis generates large datasets that are challenging to process efficiently, leading to bottlenecks in data processing and potential inaccuracies in analyte identification due to the complexity of combining various data types such as signal intensity, m/z ratio, and signal-to-noise ratios.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for assessing the quality of mass analysis data by calculating quality scores based on intensity ratios of main and isotope peaks, signal-to-noise ratios, and mass accuracy, which are combined to provide an overall quality score for compound libraries, using a centralized control system and data processing module to efficiently process and analyze mass spectrometry data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high throughput mass spectrometry analysis is performed to analyze hundreds or thousands of samples, then sample analysis throughput is improved, but data processing complexity increases and bottlenecks occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample analysis throughputVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large mass spectrometry dataset into individual sample datasets and further divides processing into multiple quality assessment dimensions (isotope profile matching, signal-to-noise ratio, peak integration quality). This segmentation allows parallel processing of different samples and quality metrics, reducing the computational bottleneck while maintaining high throughput analysis capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces automated quality scoring algorithms as intermediaries between raw mass spectrometry data and analyte identification results. These algorithms automatically assess data quality across multiple parameters and filter low-quality data before further analysis, reducing the burden on subsequent processing steps and enabling efficient handling of large sample volumes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple data types (signal intensity, m/z ratio, signal-to-noise ratio) are combined for analyte identification, then identification accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalyte identification accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary quality assessment of mass spectrometry data before analyte identification by evaluating isotope profile matching, signal-to-noise ratios, and peak integration quality. This preliminary filtering removes low-quality data points early in the workflow, preventing wasted processing time on inaccurate data while maintaining high identification accuracy for quality-approved samples

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms multiple quality parameters (isotope ratios, signal-to-noise ratios, peak areas) into a unified quality score through mathematical relationships. This parameter transformation consolidates multiple data types into a single actionable metric, enabling rapid quality assessment without sacrificing the information content needed for accurate analyte identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240418686A1Methods and systems for assessing a quality of mass analysis data generated by a mass spectrometer
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 DH TECH DEVMENT PTE
  • US20240418686A1 patent drawing
  • US20240418686A1 patent drawing
  • US20240418686A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for assessing a quality of mass analysis data generated by a mass analysis device, including collecting mass spectrometry data for a given compound, deriving a measured isotope profile based on the collected mass spectrometry data, determining a predicted isotope profile, determining a first quality score for the mass analysis data, the first quality score being based on a relationship between an intensity of the main peak and intensities of the one or more isotope peaks, determining a second quality score for the mass analysis data, the second quality score being based on a signal-to-noise ratio of the mass analysis data, determining an overall quality score as a combination of the first quality score and the second quality score, and assessing a quality of a compound library based on the determined overall quality score.