Self-Verification Mass Flow Controller Using Pressure Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mass flow controllers (MFCs) often become out of calibration during semiconductor manufacturing processes, leading to lower yields or complete failure, as existing systems require offline testing and do not continuously verify accuracy in real time.

Innovation Solution

A pressure-based mass flow control system that includes a control valve, controller, and a source of fluid for real-time verification, using pressure and temperature sensors to calculate and adjust flow rates, allowing for self-verification and potential recalibration during process steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If offline testing with mass flow verifiers is used to test MFC accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to process interruption and time loss

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMFC accuracy verificationVSAvoidprocess throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration using a known reference flow rate before the actual manufacturing process begins. This preliminary action establishes a baseline for accuracy verification, allowing the MFC to be tested against the reference value without interrupting the main production process. The controller stores this reference measurement and uses it for continuous verification during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous accuracy verification by automatically comparing the MFC's measured flow rate against the stored reference flow rate during the entire manufacturing process. This continuous monitoring occurs without stopping the process, maintaining productivity while ensuring the MFC remains within acceptable accuracy tolerances throughout production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Reliability

If offline testing is performed to verify MFC calibration, then reliability is improved through accurate detection, but loss of time increases due to process interruption

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMFC calibration accuracyVSAvoidprocess downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration using a known reference flow rate before the actual manufacturing process begins. This preliminary action establishes a baseline for accuracy verification, allowing the MFC to be tested against the reference value without interrupting the main production process. The controller stores this reference measurement and uses it for continuous verification during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the controller continuously compares the MFC's measured flow rate against the stored reference flow rate. When the measured value deviates from the reference by more than a predetermined tolerance, the system generates an alert or error signal, enabling timely intervention while maintaining process continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If real-time verification is implemented using pressure and temperature sensors, then productivity is improved through continuous monitoring, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous verification capabilityVSAvoidsystem component count
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses pressure and temperature sensors as intermediary measurement devices to indirectly verify MFC accuracy. Instead of requiring direct flow rate measurement with complex equipment, the system measures easily obtainable parameters (pressure and temperature) and uses the ideal gas law to calculate flow rate. This intermediary approach simplifies the verification system while enabling continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical flow measurement devices with electronic sensing and calculation. Instead of using mechanical mass flow verifiers that require physical connection and process interruption, the system uses electronic pressure and temperature sensors combined with computational methods (ideal gas law) to verify MFC accuracy, reducing mechanical complexity while enabling real-time operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables continuous accuracy verification and recalibration of MFCs in real time, preventing calibration drift and ensuring consistent flow rates, thereby reducing the risk of product failure and increasing yield.

Implementation Method 1

a flow restrictor to generate chocked flow condition for flow measurement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChocked flow: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a pressure sensor for providing a pressure measurement signal representative of the measured pressure of fluid upstream to the flow restrictor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement:

Implementation Method 3

a temperature sensor for providing a temperature measurement signal representative of the measured temperature of fluid in the system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature measurement:

Data Source

PatentUS10801867B2Method and apparatus for self verification of pressured based mass flow controllers
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 MKS INSTR INC
  • US10801867B2 patent drawing
  • US10801867B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mass flow control system can be self verified for its accuracy when controlling a flow to a process. The system comprises: a control valve for controlling the flow of fluid through the system as a function of a control signal; a controller for generating the control signal as a function of measured flow of fluid through the system and a targeted flow set point; a pressure sensor for measuring the controlling fluid pressure for use in measuring and verifying the flow rate; and a source of fluid for providing a known volume of fluid for use in verifying the system accuracy anytime between steps of the flow control process.