Mass Flow Meter Pressure Sensing Beyond the Linear Range

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Mass Flow Controllers (MFCs) face challenges in maintaining precision and accuracy due to the need for tight flow rate control, multiple set points, and frequent shutdowns and restarts during semiconductor wafer manufacturing. Existing MFCs are limited by the linear range of pressure sensors, which restricts their operational range and leads to material damage and measurement inaccuracies at higher pressures.

Innovation Solution

The development of an improved MFC that utilizes pressure sensors capable of operating in both linear and non-linear pressure deflection ranges without material damage. This is achieved by using silicon-based diaphragms that can be deflected beyond the traditional linear range into an extended non-linear range, allowing for a larger ratio of maximum overpressure to annual zero drift. This design enables the MFC to maintain stability and accuracy over a wider operating range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pressure sensors are used with a limited linear range, then measurement precision is maintained within that range, but the operational range is restricted and material damage occurs at higher pressures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure measurement precisionVSAvoidoperational pressure range
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure sensor's operational range is segmented into a linear region and a non-linear region. The sensor is designed to operate primarily in the linear region for high-precision measurements, while the non-linear region provides extended operational capability. This segmentation allows the sensor to maintain measurement precision in the critical linear range while expanding the overall operational pressure range through the non-linear region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes changes in the physical parameters of the diaphragm material (silicon-based) to enable operation beyond the traditional linear elastic range. By carefully selecting and engineering the material properties, the sensor can operate in a non-linear region where the diaphragm undergoes large deflections without permanent deformation, thus expanding the operational pressure range while maintaining measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the linear range of pressure sensors is extended, then operational range increases, but measurement accuracy decreases in the non-linear region

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational pressure rangeVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts its operation based on the pressure range. When operating in the non-linear region, the system compensates for the non-linearity through calibration data and algorithms, maintaining measurement accuracy across the extended range. This dynamic adaptation allows the sensor to utilize the full operational range while preserving precision through software-based correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs silicon-based diaphragms with specific material properties that enable large elastic deflections. The composite structure and material selection allow the diaphragm to operate in a non-linear region while maintaining reversible deformation, thus extending the operational range without sacrificing the fundamental measurement capability through careful material engineering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If silicon-based diaphragms are deflected beyond the linear range, then operational range increases, but material damage may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure deflection rangeVSAvoidmaterial integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor design incorporates a safety margin and protective features that prevent the diaphragm from entering the plastic deformation region. The maximum operating pressure is set below the yield point of the silicon-based material, providing a cushion that prevents material damage even during transient overpressure events. This beforehand protection ensures the diaphragm remains within the elastic region, maintaining reliability while enabling extended operational range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent carefully controls the physical parameters of the diaphragm including thickness, diameter, and material composition to optimize the balance between operational range and material integrity. By adjusting these parameters, the diaphragm is designed to accommodate large deflections in the non-linear elastic region while maintaining sufficient strength to prevent permanent deformation or failure, thus extending operational range without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The improved MFC achieves significantly increased annual stability relative to its maximum operating range, leading to enhanced performance and value. It can operate effectively in non-linear regions without material damage, allowing a single MFC to replace two conventional MFCs, thus reducing system complexity and cost.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure sensor's overpressure rating is the maximum pressure the device can experience without introducing material calibration shift

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoresistive effect: Piezoresistive Effect

Implementation Method 2

silicon based diaphragms can be deflected well past the linear pressure deflection range (a primarily bending-based mechanism) into an extended non-linear pressure deflection range

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4542181A1A valve assembly and system used to control flow rate of a fluid
Publication Date: 2025.04.23 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP4542181A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4542181A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4542181A1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A mass flow meter includes a flow pathway through the mass flow meter, wherein the flow pathway comprises a first cavity and a second cavity. The mass flow meter also includes a laminar flow element adjacent to the first cavity and the second cavity, wherein the first cavity is upstream of the laminar flow element and the second cavity is downstream of the laminar flow element. A pressure transducer is positioned in at least one of the first cavity or the second cavity, wherein the pressure transducer includes at least one diaphragm and measures linear and non-linear responses of the at least one diaphragm to a first pressure to determine a voltage signal indicative of a pressure. The mass flow meter converts the pressure reading obtained from the pressure transducer into a signal indicative of a mass flow rate through the laminar flow element.