Pressure-Based Mass Flow Ratio Control With Linearized Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pressure-based flow ratio control systems face challenges with nonlinear relationships between pressure sensor signals and flow rates, requiring knowledge of gas properties, and low differential pressure measurements can be inaccurate due to the error band of absolute pressure sensors.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a laminar flow element as a pressure drop element to create a linear response between secondary flow rates and pressure signals, and using a differential pressure sensing element to improve accuracy, especially in low pressure drop conditions, by replacing one absolute pressure sensor with a differential pressure sensor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pressure-based flow sensors are used to avoid thermal flow sensor drift, then reliability is improved, but the relationship between pressure sensor signal and flow rate becomes highly nonlinear requiring knowledge of gas properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the measurement parameter from direct pressure measurement to differential pressure measurement across a flow restrictor. This parameter change linearizes the relationship between the sensor signal and flow rate, eliminating the need for complex gas property knowledge while maintaining the reliability advantages of pressure-based sensing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If a common pressure sensor is shared at the inlet of the FRC, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to capture local pressure variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of sensorsVSAvoidflow rate measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a flow restrictor as an intermediary element between the common pressure sensor and the secondary flow lines. This intermediary creates a measurable pressure differential that captures local flow conditions, enabling accurate flow rate measurement while still using a single shared pressure sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If laminar flow element is used to create linear response, then the relationship between flow rate and pressure signal is improved, but differential pressure across the element becomes very low falling within error band of absolute pressure sensors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate linearityVSAvoiddifferential pressure measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a flow restrictor as an intermediary that creates a measurable pressure differential. By positioning the pressure sensor to measure across this restrictor rather than using absolute pressure sensors, the system captures the pressure drop directly, achieving both linear flow response and measurable differential pressure signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If differential pressure sensing element is used to replace one absolute pressure sensor, then measurement precision is improved for low pressure drop conditions, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelow differential pressure accuracyVSAvoidsensor configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow restrictor acts as a mediator that enables the use of a differential pressure sensor to directly measure the pressure drop across it. This configuration provides accurate low differential pressure measurement while simplifying the overall sensor architecture compared to using multiple absolute pressure sensors with complex differential calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration allows for precise control of secondary flow rates without prior knowledge of gas properties and enhances measurement accuracy, particularly in low pressure drop scenarios, providing a more stable and accurate flow ratio control.

Implementation Method 1

a laminar flow element may be chosen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaminar flow: Laminar Flow

Implementation Method 2

a differential pressure sensing element in communication with the pressures upstream and downstream of the pressure drop element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential measurement: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS11940307B2Methods and apparatus for pressure based mass flow ratio control
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 MKS INSTR INC
  • US11940307B2 patent drawing
  • US11940307B2 patent drawing
  • US11940307B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for dividing a single mass flow into secondary flows of desired ratios to total flow. Each secondary flow line includes a pressure drop element, an absolute pressure sensor and a differential pressure sensor. The nonlinear relationship between flow and pressures can be transformed into a function of the absolute and differential pressures that has a linear relationship with the flow.