Mass Flow Valve Linearization for Precise Low-Noise Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Mass Flow Controllers (MFCs) lack the sophistication to maintain a consistent and continuous desired flow rate without introducing noise due to non-linear artifacts, failing to provide precise control over fluid flow.

Innovation Solution

A valve control system incorporating a gain controller, linearization control system, and set point filter that determines a gain value from filtered set point values, real-time fluid parameters, valve model data, actuator gain, and valve model gain to control the linear response time of the valve, using a Gain-Lead-Lag controller and filtering mechanisms like slew-rate limiting and low-pass filters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional MFC control algorithms are used, then the system is simple to implement, but the flow rate control precision deteriorates due to non-linear artifacts and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate control precisionVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control algorithm dynamically adjusts the gain value based on real-time operating conditions (fluid pressure, temperature, flow rate) and valve position. The gain schedule is not fixed but adapts continuously to maintain optimal control precision across the entire control range, resolving the contradiction by making the controller intelligent rather than static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter (gain value) as a function of operating conditions and valve lift position. By implementing a gain schedule that varies with these parameters, the system maintains high precision control without requiring overly complex hardware, thus improving measurement precision while managing algorithm complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If the valve response time is reduced for faster control, then the transient response improves, but non-linear artifacts and noise are introduced into the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve response speedVSAvoidnon-linear artifacts and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control algorithm continuously monitors the actual flow rate and compares it to the setpoint, using this feedback to adjust the gain value dynamically. This feedback mechanism allows the system to achieve fast response when needed while suppressing non-linear artifacts and noise through active compensation, resolving the contradiction between speed and harmful factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The gain value dynamically adapts based on the operating point and valve position, allowing the system to optimize response speed at different operating conditions while minimizing non-linear artifacts. The dynamic nature of the control algorithm enables it to maintain stability and reduce noise even during transient responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the control range is extended to cover the entire flow rate span, then the versatility improves, but maintaining consistent precision across the range becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol range coverageVSAvoidprecision consistency across control range
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control algorithm implements local optimization by adjusting the gain value according to the specific operating point and valve lift position. Each region of the control range has its own optimized gain characteristics, ensuring consistent precision locally while covering the entire control range globally. This resolves the contradiction by making the controller adaptable to local conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic gain scheduling allows the controller to adapt its characteristics to different regions of the control range. By continuously adjusting the gain based on the current operating point, the system maintains consistent precision across the entire control range, achieving both versatility and precision consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10969797B2Mass flow valve controller and control method with set point filter and linearization system based on valve model
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US10969797B2 patent drawing
  • US10969797B2 patent drawing
  • US10969797B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A valve control system that includes a gain controller for controlling the linear response of a valve. The system includes a linearization control system coupled to the gain controller to determine a gain value to control the linear response time of the valve and a set point filter coupled to the linearization control system to filter a set point value. The linearization control system determines the gain value from the filtered set point value, at least one real-time fluid parameter value, valve model data, an actuator gain, and a valve model gain.