Mass Spectrometry Peak-Based Charge Deconvolution for Reliable Mass Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional charge deconvolution methods in mass spectrometry face issues such as the inclusion of artefacts, high computational complexity, memory requirements, and unpredictable convergence times, along with difficulties in optimizing parameter conditions, especially when analyzing high molecular compounds like antibodies.

Innovation Solution

A data processing method involving peak detection, approximate mass calculation, class selection based on likelihood, and estimated mass calculation, which avoids artefacts by focusing on the principle that mass equals m/z value multiplied by the correct number of charges, reducing complexity and memory usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional charge deconvolution methods are used to estimate monoisotopic mass and isotopic envelope, then mass estimation capability is improved, but artefacts are included in the processing result

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass estimation capabilityVSAvoidprocessing result reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts only the necessary information (m/z values and charge numbers) from the mass spectrum to calculate approximate masses, discarding the complex model-based processing that generates artefacts. By taking out only the essential calculation elements and eliminating the complex deconvolution algorithms, the method achieves reliable mass estimation without artefact contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If complex computation processing is performed for charge deconvolution, then mass estimation accuracy is improved, but high-capacity memory is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass estimation accuracyVSAvoidmemory capacity requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces complex, memory-intensive computational models with simple, disposable calculations. Instead of maintaining complex data structures and models in memory, the method performs straightforward multiplication operations (m/z × charge number) that require minimal memory resources, achieving the same estimation accuracy with vastly reduced memory requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Measurement precision

If complex computation processing is performed for charge deconvolution, then mass estimation accuracy is improved, but processing time becomes unpredictable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary determination of the charge number range before detailed mass calculation. By pre-establishing the expected charge numbers and their corresponding m/z ranges, the method creates a structured framework that guides subsequent calculations, making the processing time predictable and manageable while maintaining accurate mass estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If conventional charge deconvolution algorithms are used, then comprehensive mass analysis is achieved, but parameter optimization becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass analysis comprehensivenessVSAvoidparameter optimization ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention simplifies parameter optimization by changing from complex model parameters to basic physical parameters (m/z values and charge numbers). The method allows users to easily adjust the charge number range and mass-to-charge ratio intervals without needing to optimize complex algorithm parameters, making the system both comprehensive and easy to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250349527A1Mass Spectrometry Data Processing Method and Mass Spectrometer
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 SHIMADZU CORP
  • US20250349527A1 patent drawing
  • US20250349527A1 patent drawing
  • US20250349527A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A peak-information acquirer detects peaks in a m/z spectrum based on mass spectrometry data acquired by a measurement section and collects peak information including m/z values of the peaks. An approximate-mass calculator calculates approximate masses by multiplying the m/z value of each peak by each of the numbers of charges within an expected charge-number range determined beforehand. A class selector determines, for a plurality of approximate masses, the frequency of each approximate mass or each class having a predetermined mass width as a likelihood of the approximate mass and selects an approximate mass or a class estimated to be highly reliable based on the likelihood. An estimated-mass calculator calculates an estimated mass of a compound corresponding to an approximate mass included in one or more approximate masses or classes selected, based on the peak information and the number of charges of the corresponding peak used for calculating that approximate mass.