Mass Spectrometry Reinjection for Inconclusive Compound Screening

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mass spectrometry techniques for screening samples are time-consuming and prone to inconclusive results due to noisy or chemically ambiguous data, especially when dealing with unstable or short-shelf-life samples, leading to potential sample spoilage and human error.

Innovation Solution

Implement an iterative injection protocol in a chromatograph-equipped mass spectrometer that progressively narrows the scanning protocol based on inconclusive classifications, automatically classifying compounds as present, absent, or inconclusive, and triggers reinjections until all compounds on the screening list are conclusively determined.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional mass spectrometry screening is performed, then compound detection is achieved, but the analysis time is excessive and samples may degrade before conclusive results are obtained

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The screening process is divided into multiple iterative passes, each focusing on compounds that were inconclusive in previous passes. This segmentation allows the system to progressively resolve ambiguous classifications without re-analyzing already-determined compounds, thereby reducing total analysis time while maintaining conclusive accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification in the first pass to identify which compounds need further analysis. By pre-identifying inconclusive compounds and planning targeted reinjections, the system avoids unnecessary repeated analysis of already-resolved compounds, optimizing the balance between measurement precision and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If multiple reinjections are performed to achieve conclusive results, then classification accuracy improves, but the complexity of the analysis protocol increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from each classification pass to dynamically adjust the reinjection strategy. Compounds classified as inconclusive trigger targeted reinjections with modified scanning protocols, while conclusive compounds are excluded from further analysis. This feedback-driven approach simplifies the overall protocol complexity by making reinjections conditional rather than universal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The scanning protocol dynamically adapts based on classification results from previous passes. The system modifies the scanning protocol for subsequent reinjections to focus specifically on inconclusive compounds, rather than performing static, identical scans on all compounds each time. This dynamic adjustment reduces protocol complexity while improving determination accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If comprehensive screening of all compounds is performed in each injection, then no compounds are missed, but the analysis time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and isolates only the inconclusive compounds from the full screening list for reinjection. By taking out already-resolved compounds from further analysis and focusing resources only on ambiguous cases, the system maintains screening completeness for critical compounds while significantly improving overall throughput and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Different scanning strategies are applied to different compounds based on their classification status. Conclusive compounds receive no further analysis, while inconclusive compounds receive targeted reinjections with modified protocols. This local quality approach ensures reliability for compounds needing verification while maximizing productivity by avoiding redundant analysis of resolved compounds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the time required for conclusive screening by minimizing inconclusive results, allowing rapid analysis of unstable samples without sample degradation.

Implementation Method 1

a chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChromatography: Chromatography

Implementation Method 2

a chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass spectrometry:

Data Source

PatentUS20260063598A1Inconclusive-triggered reinjection for mass spectrometry screening
Publication Date: 2026.03.05
  • US20260063598A1 patent drawing
  • US20260063598A1 patent drawing
  • US20260063598A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems/techniques are provided for facilitating inconclusive-triggered reinjection for mass spectrometry screening. In various embodiments, a system can access a screening list specifying a plurality of target chemical compounds. In various aspects, the system can classify respective ones of the plurality of target chemical compounds as being present or absent in a sample, based on causing a chromatograph and mass spectrometer to perform on the sample an iterative injection protocol whose subsequent iterations are progressively compound-selective and triggered by inconclusive presence or absence classifications from prior iterations.