Dynamic Mass Transit Routing via Hub Stop Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Scaling on-demand transportation services for mass transit vehicles to serve tens or hundreds of passengers within a short timeframe is complex and cannot be reasonably accomplished by manual planning techniques, and existing systems lack efficient dynamic routing solutions that account for changing demand and safety constraints.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for routing mass transit vehicles that dynamically selects hub stops as waypoints based on threshold times, minimum allowed waytime, and minimum progress, allowing vehicles to adjust routes in real-time to optimize service requests without manual driver intervention, using a central dispatch system and telemetric data for route optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual planning techniques are used for routing mass transit vehicles, then the system is simple to operate, but it cannot efficiently serve tens or hundreds of passengers within a short timeframe

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice capacityVSAvoidrouting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system performs self-service through automated algorithms that dynamically determine optimal routes and stops based on real-time passenger requests and vehicle locations, eliminating the need for manual driver intervention while handling large volumes of passengers efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical routing decisions with automated computer-based algorithms that process passenger requests, calculate travel times, and determine optimal stops without human intervention, thereby increasing service capacity while managing system complexity through software

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If driver interaction is required to accept passenger requests during trips, then the system can handle on-demand requests, but it creates unsafe driving practices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveon-demand service capabilityVSAvoiddriving safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle routing system serves itself by automatically accepting and processing passenger requests without driver interaction. The automated system evaluates requests, determines routing decisions, and manages trip modifications independently, maintaining safety while preserving on-demand adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated routing system as an intermediary between passengers and vehicles. This intermediary processes all request-related operations, eliminating the need for drivers to interact with passenger requests while maintaining the system's ability to handle on-demand service

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed vehicle routes are used, then the transportation service is predictable and easy to schedule, but it cannot adapt to changing passenger demand patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand responsivenessVSAvoidrouting decision time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system transitions from static fixed routes to dynamic adaptive routing. The system continuously adjusts vehicle routes and stops based on real-time passenger requests and conditions, enabling demand responsiveness while automated processing maintains rapid decision-making without significant time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11113974B1System and method for automated routing of mass transit vehicles
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 PANTONIUM INC
  • US11113974B1 patent drawing
  • US11113974B1 patent drawing
  • US11113974B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented system and method for routing a vehicle. The method includes establishing, in a computer memory, a set of parameters comprising a plurality of hub stops and a threshold time, receiving a service request comprising a service location, determining a current location of the vehicle, determining an upcoming travel time for the vehicle to travel from the current location to the service location, and determining, via a processor, a next stop for the vehicle selected from: if the upcoming travel time does not exceed the threshold time, the service location; and if the upcoming travel time exceeds the threshold time, one of the plurality of hub stops.