Massive MIMO Beamforming Estimation Under Power Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing beamforming techniques in massive MIMO networks face challenges in balancing power distribution across antennas while maintaining spatial diversity and throughput, often leading to inefficient power usage and interference issues.

Innovation Solution

A method for beamforming estimation that incorporates power constraints and iterative optimization of precoding and decoding matrices to balance power distribution and minimize interference, using techniques such as zero-forcing and minimum mean square error to enhance signal transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional beamforming techniques are used in massive MIMO networks, then spatial diversity is maintained, but power distribution across antennas becomes inefficient and interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower dissipationVSAvoidinterference level
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by iteratively adjusting power levels and precoding matrices based on channel estimates and power constraints. The system modifies power distribution parameters across antennas through optimization algorithms that balance power allocation with interference management, transforming the static power distribution into a dynamic, optimized parameter set that reduces energy loss while controlling interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where channel estimates are continuously obtained and used to adjust precoding matrices and power levels. The system feeds back information about channel conditions and power consumption to iteratively optimize the beamforming parameters, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts power distribution in real-time to minimize energy dissipation and interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Use of energy by moving object

If power constraints are applied to balance power distribution, then power efficiency improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower distribution efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex power optimization problem into manageable steps through iterative algorithms. Instead of solving a single complex optimization problem, the system breaks it down into sequential steps: obtaining channel estimates, computing initial power levels, adjusting for power constraints, and generating precoding matrices. This segmentation allows the system to handle complexity through structured, incremental computation rather than monolithic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic optimization where power levels and precoding matrices are adjusted iteratively based on current channel conditions. The system dynamically adapts power distribution across antennas and time according to varying channel estimates, transforming static power allocation into a dynamic process that responds to real-time conditions, thereby managing computational complexity through time-varying optimization rather than static heavy computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If iterative optimization of precoding and decoding matrices is performed, then spatial diversity and throughput are enhanced, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-computing and storing channel estimates and power constraint parameters before the main optimization process. The system prepares initial precoding matrices and power level adjustments in advance based on channel conditions, so that during actual transmission, the optimization can start from these pre-computed values rather than from scratch, reducing the effective processing time while maintaining optimization benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial optimization by performing a limited number of iterative steps or using approximations that provide sufficient improvement without requiring exhaustive optimization. The system applies partial action by adjusting power levels and precoding matrices through a predetermined number of iterations or by using simplified optimization criteria that balance throughput enhancement with processing time constraints, avoiding excessive computational effort while achieving acceptable performance improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12432662B2Beamforming estimation
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 MAXLINEAR INC
  • US12432662B2 patent drawing
  • US12432662B2 patent drawing
  • US12432662B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an aspect of an embodiment, a base station configured for beamforming estimation in a massive multiple input multiple output (mMIMO) radio access network (RAN) (mMIMO-RAN) may comprise a processing device and a transceiver. The processing device may be configured to obtain a channel estimate for a user equipment (UE). The processing device may be configured to compute a first power level adjustment for a downlink (DL) signal and a second power level adjustment for the DL signal. The second power level adjustment may be based on a power constraint. The transceiver may be configured to transmit the DL signal to the UE.