Master-Contract Resource Binding for Cross-Platform Blockchain Transfer
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing blockchain networks face low resource transfer and scheduling efficiency, as well as low interoperability across application platforms, due to the need for separate transfer and scheduling of resources on each platform, even when they are collected across multiple platforms.
Innovation Solution
A method and apparatus that utilize a master contract and sub-contracts on a blockchain to manage resource packages across multiple platforms, allowing for collective scheduling and transfer by deploying resources in a master contract, binding them to a master contract address, and transferring ownership between objects.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If resources are transferred and scheduled separately on each application platform, then resource ownership and control are maintained on individual platforms, but resource transfer and scheduling efficiency are low and interoperability across platforms is poor
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments resource management into two distinct layers: individual platform sub-contracts that maintain local resource ownership and control, and a cross-platform master contract that enables collective management. This segmentation allows resources to be managed locally while enabling efficient cross-platform operations through the master contract coordination mechanism.
Solution Approach 2:
The master contract serves as an intermediary layer between multiple application platform sub-contracts. It receives binding requests from sub-contracts, manages resource packages collectively, and coordinates transfers across platforms. This intermediary structure enables interoperability without requiring changes to individual platform resource management systems.
2Adaptability or versatility
If a master contract structure is implemented to enable collective resource management, then resource transfer and scheduling efficiency improve and interoperability enhances, but contract structure complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The master contract is designed as a universal structure that can manage resource packages from multiple different application platforms simultaneously. It provides multi-functional capabilities including binding resources from various sub-contracts, coordinating transfers across different platforms, and maintaining compatibility with diverse platform-specific resource types and ownership models.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements a nested contract structure where individual platform sub-contracts are embedded within the broader master contract framework. Each sub-contract maintains its independence for local resource management while being nested within the master contract that provides cross-platform coordination. This nesting allows complex multi-platform management while preserving simplicity at the individual platform level.
Data Source
Figure 1~2A
Figure 2B~2C
Figure 2D~2E
AI summary
Provided in the present application are a blockchain resource processing method and apparatus, an electronic device, a storage medium, and a program product. The blockchain resource processing method comprises: in response to a deployment request by a first object for a target resource packet, deploying the target resource packet in an overall contract; receiving a binding request by the first object for a plurality of target resources to be bound which are in the target resource packet, wherein for each target resource to be bound, a second owner in a sub-contract corresponding to the target resource to be bound is already registered as the first object; in response to the binding request, transferring the second owner from being the first object to being the address of the overall contract, so as to determine the target resources to be bound as bound target resources; and, in response to an ownership transfer request by a second object for the bound target resources, transferring a first owner of the bound target resources to be the second object.