Master Controller for Automated Hydraulic Fracturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydraulic fracturing operations face inefficiencies due to the complexity of managing multiple trailers with disparate engines, transmissions, and pumps, leading to increased costs, fluid leaks, emissions, and equipment wear, as human operators struggle to optimize these systems effectively.

Innovation Solution

A master controller system that determines site and trailer configurations, receives desired operating conditions, and generates control signals using trailer models to optimize the operation of engines, transmissions, and pumps, reducing manual intervention and optimizing efficiency across multiple trailers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If human operators manually control multiple trailers with disparate engines, transmissions, and pumps, then operational flexibility is maintained, but system efficiency decreases and equipment wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of managing multiple trailers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges control of multiple disparate trailers into a unified automated control system. The system integrates control signals for multiple trailers with different engines, transmissions, and pumps, coordinating their operation to achieve optimal system efficiency while reducing the complexity of manual management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated control system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor the operational status of multiple trailers and adjust control signals in real-time. This feedback loop enables the system to optimize efficiency dynamically while managing the complexity of coordinating disparate equipment through centralized intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-generated harmful factors

If human operators manually monitor and control fracking equipment, then adaptability to changing conditions is maintained, but operational costs increase and emissions rise

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidmanual control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs self-service by automatically monitoring equipment status and adjusting operational parameters without human intervention. This autonomous operation reduces emissions by optimizing fuel combustion and operational efficiency while eliminating the need for manual control, thereby reducing operational costs and harmful emissions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Duration of action of stationary object

If traditional manual control methods are used, then equipment lifetime is reduced due to inefficiencies, but automation hardware complexity is avoided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment lifetimeVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an automated electronic control system that uses software algorithms to manage trailer operations. This substitution extends equipment lifetime by optimizing operational parameters and reducing wear through precise control, while the automation complexity is managed through integrated software that coordinates multiple trailers efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of substance

If multiple disparate trailers are operated manually, then operational flexibility is maintained, but fluid leaks increase due to inefficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracking fluid leaksVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated control system uses feedback from sensors monitoring fluid pressure and flow to detect and respond to conditions that may cause leaks. By continuously adjusting operational parameters based on real-time feedback, the system prevents fluid leaks while maintaining high operational efficiency, eliminating the trade-off between leak prevention and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11697985B2Automated hydraulic fracturing operation
Publication Date: 2023.07.11 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US11697985B2 patent drawing
  • US11697985B2 patent drawing
  • US11697985B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated hydraulic fracturing system and method for controlling various aspects of a fracking operation is disclosed. A master controller receives various operating parameters, such as desired operating conditions, information about a fracking site, information about trailers and/or other equipment at the fracking site, and/or sensor signals. The master controller may access one or more trailer model(s) that model various parameters of equipment (e.g., engines, transmissions, pumps, trailers, etc.) at the fracking site as a function of controlled operating conditions. The master controller uses the trailer models in conjunction with operating parameters to generate control signals that automatically control the various equipment at the fracking site to optimize various desired outcomes, such as reduced operating costs, reduced emissions, reduced idle time, increased efficiency, etc. The control signals are sent to controllers of the individual equipment to control the operations of those equipment and achieve an overall optimized fracking operation.