Master Device Network Participation Denial for Secure Parameter Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems, such as IEEE 802.11x compliant wireless LANs, face challenges in securely configuring communication parameters due to the risk of spoofing by third parties and the complexity of configuration processes, which can lead to unnecessary device participation and information leakage.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a denial mechanism for new communication devices to participate in network configuration based on their participation status and capability information, establishing a secure communication parameter configuration network by determining a master device and restricting participation, and encrypting communication to prevent unauthorized access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If wireless communication devices communicate directly with each other in an ad hoc network to configure communication parameters, then configuration convenience is improved, but security against spoofing by third parties deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration convenienceVSAvoidsecurity against spoofing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by establishing participation status verification mechanisms before configuration begins. The master device checks whether attempting devices are already participating in the ad hoc network, and denies participation to devices that are not currently participating. This pre-emptive check prevents spoofing attempts before they can compromise the configuration process, while still allowing legitimate devices to configure parameters conveniently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the network allows new communication apparatuses to participate freely during configuration, then configuration flexibility is improved, but information leakage to unauthorized devices increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration flexibilityVSAvoidinformation leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing differentiated access control based on participation status. Devices with legitimate participation status (those already connected to the ad hoc network) are granted full configuration flexibility and can freely join the configuration process. Devices without proper participation status are denied access, preventing information leakage. This creates localized security zones within the network where access rights vary by device status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10015830B2Communication apparatus and communication parameter configuration method thereof
Publication Date: 2018.07.03 CANON KK
  • US10015830B2 patent drawing
  • US10015830B2 patent drawing
  • US10015830B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A communication apparatus functioning as a master device denies participation by new communication apparatuses in a network in communication parameter configuration mode based on participation statuses of communication apparatuses functioning as slave devices in the network. The communication apparatus functioning as a master device establishes the network in communication parameter configuration mode between the communication apparatuses participating in the network, and configures communication parameters.