Master UAV Communication Shield for Swarm Threat Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Deploying swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) poses challenges in coordinating communication and responding to external threats while flying in formation, as individual UAVs may face threats and coordinating between them is complex.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a central server and multiple UAVs, including a master UAV and secondary UAVs, where the master UAV acts as a communication shield and monitors risks, and the secondary UAVs can also act as communication shields at different times, forming a swarm that shares delivery routes and dynamically adjusts formation to ensure safe communication and threat detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If UAVs are deployed in swarms to deliver packages to multiple locations, then delivery efficiency and route sharing are improved, but coordination complexity and communication management become worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery efficiencyVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The swarm is segmented into a master UAV and multiple secondary UAVs with clearly defined roles. The master UAV handles communication shielding and risk determination, while secondary UAVs focus on package delivery. This segmentation reduces coordination complexity by assigning specific functions to different segments of the swarm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The master UAV acts as an intermediary between the secondary UAVs and external communication networks. It shields the swarm from external threats and manages communication, allowing secondary UAVs to operate independently for delivery tasks without direct external interference, thus improving delivery efficiency while maintaining manageable coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If UAVs fly in formation to share routes, then energy consumption and time are reduced, but vulnerability to external threats and communication risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery timeVSAvoidexternal threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The master UAV performs preliminary anti-action by establishing communication shielding before the swarm encounters external threats. It continuously monitors for risks and blocks potential communication threats in advance, allowing the swarm to maintain its time-efficient formation flight while being protected from external harmful factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The master UAV serves as a protective intermediary between the secondary UAVs and external threats. It positions itself to shield the formation from communication-based threats while the swarm maintains its tight formation for efficient route sharing and reduced delivery time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a master UAV monitors all communication in the swarm, then security and threat detection are improved, but communication overhead and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection capabilityVSAvoidcommunication processing energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The complex task of communication monitoring and threat detection is extracted from the entire swarm and concentrated in the master UAV. This allows secondary UAVs to use minimal communication energy for basic swarm coordination, while the master UAV handles the energy-intensive communication shielding and risk determination functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The master UAV acts as an intermediary that handles all external communication and threat detection. It filters and processes communication traffic, blocking threats before they reach secondary UAVs. This intermediary role improves threat detection capability while secondary UAVs maintain low energy consumption by communicating only with the master.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10515555B2System and method for managing a swarm of unmanned aerial vehicles
Publication Date: 2019.12.24 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US10515555B2 patent drawing
  • US10515555B2 patent drawing
  • US10515555B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for managing communication of a plurality of unmanned aerial vehicles. The present invention can include a central server and a plurality of unmanned aerial vehicles including a master and secondary unmanned aerial vehicle. The master and secondary unmanned aerial vehicles can communicate with the central server and each other. The master and secondary unmanned aerial vehicle can deliver packages to different locations. In doing so, the master and secondary unmanned aerial vehicle can form a swarm that at least partially share a route for delivery of the packages to their destinations. The master unmanned aerial vehicle can be configured to: (i) receive delivery information for the master and secondary unmanned aerial vehicles, (ii) monitor communication between the swarm, and (iii) determine if the swarms encounters a risk.