Masterless Water Heater Control for Load Balancing and Small Flows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cascade water heater systems face inefficiencies due to uneven usage distribution among connected units, leading to excessive wear on some units and underutilization of others, and struggle to detect small system flows, resulting in suboptimal thermal efficiency and increased maintenance needs.

Innovation Solution

A control method that determines the heating load for each water heater based on overall efficiency and usage history, using a true masterless control scheme with communication between controllers to distribute load evenly and detect small system demands through flow limiting valves and sensors, allowing seamless addition or removal of units without disrupting service.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple water heaters are cascaded to meet varying demand, then the system can provide real-time hot water for small to large demands with failure redundancy, but the water heaters experience uneven usage distribution leading to excessive wear on some units and underutilization of others

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure redundancyVSAvoidservice life distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the operational status of each water heater based on real-time demand and historical usage data. Controllers communicate usage information across the network, and the system adaptively selects which heaters to activate and at what capacity, transitioning from static fixed-role assignment to dynamic role allocation that responds to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where each water heater controller monitors its own usage and communicates this data to the network. This feedback enables the system to track cumulative usage across all units and adjust future operational assignments to balance wear distribution, using historical data to inform future control decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If conventional cascade systems operate water heaters with fixed roles, then control is simplified, but thermal efficiency decreases due to suboptimal heating operations and inability to detect small system flows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol scheme simplicityVSAvoidthermal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Each water heater controller independently determines its own operational parameters by receiving demand signals and usage history from the network, then autonomously adjusts its heating output. This self-service approach eliminates the need for complex centralized control while enabling each unit to optimize its operation based on real-time conditions and historical performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as heating capacity, flow rate, and activation status based on real-time demand conditions and historical usage patterns. Controllers continuously adjust these parameters to optimize thermal efficiency, transitioning from fixed parameter operation to dynamic parameter optimization responsive to system conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the last water heater turned on operates at modulation while previous units run at maximum output, then the system can meet varying demand, but the last water heater experiences excessive cycling on and off when demand falls within a dead band

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand response capabilityVSAvoidoperational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of operating a single modulating heater at the boundary of its capacity range, the system activates multiple water heaters with partial capacity utilization. This distributes the heating load across several units, allowing each to operate within stable ranges and avoiding the excessive cycling that occurs when one heater operates at the limits of its modulation range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the heating load across multiple water heaters rather than concentrating modulation on a single unit. This segmentation distributes the operational stress and cycling among several heaters, improving the operational stability of individual units while maintaining the system's overall ability to respond to varying demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8175752B2Control system methods for networked water heaters
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 INTELLIHOT INC
  • US8175752B2 patent drawing
  • US8175752B2 patent drawing
  • US8175752B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a control system for controlling a plurality of fluidly and operably connected water heaters to meet a hot water demand such that overall efficiency is maximized and usage disparity between water heaters is minimized. There is further disclosed a method for detecting a small system demand in said network by adjusting the setting of each flow limiting valve of each water heater. There is still further disclosed a method for enabling seamless addition or removal of a heater in service and heating load distribution to water heaters.