Material Composition Qualification Using Predicted Suitability Scores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional material development processes are time-consuming and inefficient, often requiring manual experimentation and failing to meet the increasing quality requirements of industrially manufactured products, leading to delays and limitations in product development.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for determining material compositions that involves receiving specification parameters, calculating material composition recommendations, and evaluating their expected properties and suitability measures, allowing for rapid and targeted development of high-quality materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional manual experimentation is used to qualify material compositions, then material properties can be verified, but the process becomes time-consuming and delays product development

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial property verificationVSAvoidmaterial development time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary computational analysis and prediction of material properties before actual manufacturing and testing. By using machine learning models to predict material behavior and suitability, the system prepares material composition recommendations in advance, reducing the need for extensive manual experimentation and accelerating the qualification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If extensive manual experimentation is conducted to meet increasing quality requirements, then material quality can be improved, but development costs and time increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial qualityVSAvoiddevelopment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual experimentation and physical testing with computational models and machine learning algorithms. The computer-based system automatically analyzes material compositions, predicts properties, and evaluates suitability against quality requirements, substituting the mechanical process of manual testing with an automated information-processing system that delivers faster and more efficient results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If conventional material development processes are used, then material compositions can be qualified, but the process fails to meet increasing quality requirements and creates fundamental development limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial qualificationVSAvoidmaterial choice flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables flexible exploration of material composition parameters by allowing users to input different specification requirements and immediately receiving updated material recommendations. The machine learning models can evaluate numerous parameter combinations and suggest optimized material compositions that adapt to varying quality requirements, providing greater versatility in material selection compared to conventional fixed-process approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260044906A1Computer-implemented determination and qualification of material compositions
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 FEHRMANN MATERIALS X GMBH
  • US20260044906A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044906A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of determining a material composition for manufacturing a product (500) is described. The method comprises receiving, at a computing device (100), one or more specification parameters (122) indicative of at least one of a material property, a manufacturing process for manufacturing the product, and a product property; determining one or more material composition recommendations for the material composition based on the received one or more specification parameters; and computing, for each material composition recommendation, one or more expected properties indicative of at least one of an expected material property of the respective material composition recommendation and an expected product property of the product manufactured from the respective material composition recommendation. The method further comprises computing, based on evaluating the one or more expected properties computed for each material composition recommendation against the received one or more specification parameter (122), a suitability measure indicative of a degree of suitability to manufacture the product (500) from the respective material composition recommendation.