Material Movement Plan Evaluation Using Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for planning material movement lack a quantitative analysis of physical characteristics of work surfaces and feedback mechanisms to adjust material movement plans based on actual performance, leading to inefficiencies and potential damage to machines and terrain.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a position sensor to generate position signals, a controller to determine a target profile, and a planning system to compare the target profile with the actual profile, generating performance factor scores and providing quantitative feedback to adjust the material movement plan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a material movement plan is executed without quantitative analysis of work surface characteristics, then the operation can proceed without complex measurement systems, but the accuracy and efficiency of material movement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework surface characterization accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by comparing actual work surface measurements with target profile specifications, then using this comparison data to adjust and optimize material movement operations in real-time, improving measurement precision through continuous validation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical measurement systems with sensor-based detection systems that use optical, electromagnetic, or other non-mechanical fields to characterize work surfaces, maintaining high measurement precision while reducing mechanical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If the material movement plan is adjusted frequently based on real-time analysis, then the efficiency and effectiveness of material movement improves, but the complexity of control systems increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial movement efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization of work surface conditions and pre-calculates optimal movement parameters before actual material movement begins, allowing efficient real-time adjustments without requiring complex dynamic control systems during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes material movement efficiency by dynamically adjusting operational parameters such as machine speed, cutting depth, and path planning based on real-time work surface analysis, achieving high productivity through parameter optimization rather than system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If quantitative evaluation of target profile is implemented, then the accuracy of material movement assessment improves, but the time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial movement accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements selective quantitative analysis by focusing measurements and evaluations only on critical portions of the work surface and key performance parameters, achieving sufficient manufacturing precision without requiring complete comprehensive analysis that would consume excessive time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10186004B2System and method for evaluating a material movement plan
Publication Date: 2019.01.22 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US10186004B2 patent drawing
  • US10186004B2 patent drawing
  • US10186004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for evaluating a target profile for moving material with a work implement along a path includes a position sensor and a controller. The controller is configured to utilize a planning system to determine the target profile, receive position signals from the position sensor, and determine from the position signals an actual profile indicative of the work surface after the work implement is moved along the path to move a volume of material. The controller is further configured to compare the target profile to the actual profile, determine at least two performance factor scores based upon a difference between the target profile and the actual profile, and generate a quantitative evaluation of the target profile based upon the at least two performance factor scores.