Material Removal Tool Motion Control Using Contact Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional material removal machines lack precise movement control, leading to imprecise and crude movement, which affects their efficiency and effectiveness in operations such as cutting, grinding, and polishing.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a material removal system with control circuitry that adjusts the movement of the material removal tool based on power, thermal, and positional parameters, using current drawn by the tool actuator as an indicator to differentiate between contact and non-contact positions, thereby optimizing movement speed and force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional material removal machines are used with stationary or manual movement control, then the device complexity is low, but the manufacturing precision and movement precision are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback control by monitoring power consumption of the actuator and using this information to adjust movement parameters. The controller receives feedback about the material removal tool's contact state with the workpiece and modifies movement speed and force accordingly, resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity through intelligent control rather than mechanical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual or simple mechanical movement control with an automated control system that uses electrical signals and power monitoring. The actuator's electrical power consumption serves as a proxy for mechanical contact state, substituting complex mechanical sensors with electrical measurement to achieve precise movement control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If crude movement control is used in material removal machines, then the ease of operation is high, but the productivity and effectiveness are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically monitoring its own power consumption and using this information to optimize its movement parameters. The control system serves itself by detecting contact conditions through power measurement and autonomously adjusting speed and force, eliminating the need for complex manual operation while improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters (movement speed, force, acceleration) based on real-time power consumption data. By adjusting these parameters according to contact conditions, the system optimizes productivity without requiring complex manual intervention, as the parameters adapt automatically to operational needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If automated movement control is implemented in material removal machines, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system serves multiple functions: it monitors power consumption, determines contact state, adjusts movement speed, controls acceleration, and manages force application. By consolidating these functions into a single multi-functional controller that uses power measurement as a universal indicator, the system achieves high precision without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more precise and responsive movement control, improving the efficiency and effectiveness of material removal processes by accurately managing speed and force based on real-time operational conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The control circuitry is configured to differentiate between a contact position and a non-contact position of the material removal tool based on the current drawn by the tool actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical current draw as contact indicator: Ohm's Law

Data Source

PatentUS20230047592A1Movement control of material removal systems
Publication Date: 2023.02.16 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US20230047592A1 patent drawing
  • US20230047592A1 patent drawing
  • US20230047592A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, a material removal system may control movement of a material removal machine based on whether a material removal tool is in contact with a sample. A material removal system may include a material removal machine (e.g., saw, grinder, polisher, and/or more general material preparation and/or testing machine) that is configured to move at the urging of one or more actuators. The system may further include control circuitry configured to control movement (and/or speed, acceleration, etc.) of the material removal machine (e.g., via the actuators) based on one or more power, thermal, position, and/or other parameters that indicate whether the material removal tool of the material removal machine is in contact with a sample.