Integrated Safety Circuit for Material Testing Actuator Shutdown

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional material testing systems often fail to comply with international safety standards and require costly off-the-shelf safety components, which can compromise operator safety and system reliability.

Innovation Solution

Integration of a safety system within the material testing system using embedded electronics and circuit boards, featuring machine state indicators, redundant monitoring, and direct hardware shutdown capabilities to ensure compliance with ISO safety standards, reducing the need for external wiring and components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional off-the-shelf safety components are used, then operator safety can be improved, but system cost and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the safety system with the existing material testing system electronics by integrating safety monitoring functions into the control circuit board. This eliminates the need for separate external safety components and their associated wiring, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining safety functionality through unified monitoring of machine states and actuator control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If conventional off-the-shelf safety components are used, then operator safety can be improved, but system cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system is merged with the existing control electronics of the material testing system. By utilizing the existing circuit board and electronics infrastructure, the patent eliminates the need to purchase and install separate off-the-shelf safety components, thereby significantly reducing system cost while maintaining comprehensive safety monitoring and actuator control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If integrated safety system is implemented, then system complexity is reduced, but safety monitoring capability must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidsafety monitoring capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit board is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it controls the actuators for normal operation and monitors machine states for safety compliance. This multi-functional approach allows the integrated system to maintain comprehensive safety monitoring capability while reducing overall system complexity by eliminating separate dedicated safety components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If integrated safety system is implemented, then external wiring is eliminated, but safety standard compliance must be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexternal wiringVSAvoidsafety standard compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated safety system continuously monitors machine states and provides feedback to the control circuit board. This feedback mechanism ensures that the system can detect unsafe conditions and respond appropriately, maintaining compliance with safety standards like ISO 13849-1 without requiring external wiring to separate safety components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11592376B2Safety systems and material testing systems including safety systems
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US11592376B2 patent drawing
  • US11592376B2 patent drawing
  • US11592376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Safety systems and material testing systems including safety systems are disclosed. An example material testing system includes: an actuator configured to control an operator-accessible component of the material testing system; an actuator disabling circuit configured to disable the actuator; and one or more processors configured to: control the actuator based on a material testing process; monitor a plurality of inputs associated with operation of the material testing system; determine, based on the plurality of inputs and the material testing process, a state of the material testing system from a plurality of predetermined states, the predetermined states comprising one or more unrestricted states and one or more restricted states; and control the actuator disabling circuit based on the determined state.