Material Testing System Software Verification via UI Recording
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional material testing systems lack the capability to verify the similarity or dissimilarity of test methods and ensure the correct installation and operation of software applications used in these systems.
Innovation Solution
A material testing system that includes a computing device configured to capture recordings of user interface outputs during test method setup, execution, and analysis, and generate documents discussing these aspects, while also comparing test methods to identify similarities and differences.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If conventional material testing systems are used without verification capabilities, then the system complexity remains low, but the reliability of test method consistency and software installation correctness cannot be ensured
Solution Approach 1:
The system creates digital copies (recordings) of the user interface outputs during test method setup, execution, and analysis. These recordings are then captured and stored for later verification, allowing comparison between different test methods without adding physical complexity to the testing apparatus itself
Solution Approach 2:
A computing device acts as an intermediary between the material testing machine and the verification process. The computing device captures recordings, compares test methods, and generates verification documents, isolating the complexity from the core testing system while ensuring reliability
2Productivity
If manual verification of test methods is performed, then the system remains simple, but the time required for verification and documentation increases significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs self-verification by automatically capturing recordings of user interface outputs, comparing test methods against each other, and generating verification documents without requiring manual intervention. The computing device autonomously executes the verification process, eliminating time-consuming manual steps
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements automated feedback loops where test method recordings are captured, analyzed, and compared systematically. The comparison results feed into automatic document generation, creating a continuous verification process that reduces both time and manual effort
3Loss of information
If comprehensive recordings of user interface outputs are captured during test setup, execution, and analysis, then the verification capability is enhanced, but the data storage requirements and processing complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system extracts only the necessary information from the user interface outputs during test setup, execution, and analysis. Rather than storing all possible data, the computing device selectively captures relevant user interface elements that are essential for verification, reducing storage requirements while maintaining verification capability
Data Source
AI summary
Described herein are examples of material testing systems configured to verify that two test methods are similar or dissimilar, and/or that a software application enabling setup, execution, and/or analysis of the test method(s) is installed and/or operating correctly. The systems are further configured to provide supporting documentation of the similarity/dissimilarity and/or correct installation/operation. Moreover, the systems are configured to reference data recorded during setup, execution, and/or result analysis of the test methods as evidence of the correct installation/operation and/or similarity/dissimilarity.