Materials Search Using ML for Radiation Shielding and Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods in material science fail to systematically optimize materials for both mechanical properties and radiation shielding, neglecting the chemical composition and requiring computationally expensive techniques, and do not effectively address the full spectrum of radiation, including primary and secondary radiation.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using evolutionary and machine learning techniques to optimize materials by linking chemical composition with radiation shielding and structural properties, employing multi-objective optimization and training models to generate layered structures that address both primary and secondary radiation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If computational methods are used to predict material properties, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to reliance on incomplete databases and approximations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial search efficiencyVSAvoidproperty prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple computational methods (evolutionary algorithms, machine learning, crystal structure prediction) into an integrated material search system. This merging allows the system to leverage the strengths of each method while compensating for their individual weaknesses, improving both productivity and measurement precision simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal material search system that can predict multiple material properties (mechanical, radiation shielding, thermal) using a single integrated platform. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate databases and methods for each property type, improving efficiency while maintaining accuracy through cross-validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If crystal structure prediction methods are used, then manufacturing precision is improved for crystal materials, but adaptability deteriorates because engineering materials are typically not pure crystals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystal structure controlVSAvoidapplicability to engineering materials
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the material representation from strict crystal structure parameters to compositional parameters (elemental composition, stoichiometry) that can describe both crystalline and non-crystalline materials. This parameter change enables the system to maintain manufacturing precision for crystals while gaining adaptability to amorphous materials, polymers, and composite materials used in engineering applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If state-of-the-art mechanical properties prediction methods (FEA, CH) are used, then strength is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to computational expense

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical properties prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using simplified mechanical properties prediction models for initial material screening, then applying full FEA or CH only to selected candidates. This hierarchical approach maintains high strength prediction accuracy for final selections while dramatically improving overall productivity by avoiding exhaustive computational analysis of all candidate materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary mechanical properties assessment using computationally efficient methods before committing to expensive FEA or CH simulations. This preliminary action filters out inadequate candidates early in the design process, ensuring that high-accuracy methods are applied only when necessary, thus balancing strength prediction with productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If empirical methods are used to design radiation shields, then reliability is improved for specific applications, but adaptability deteriorates as they only consider one radiation shielding parameter at a time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation shielding effectivenessVSAvoidmulti-parameter optimization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms radiation shield design from single-parameter empirical optimization to multi-parameter systematic optimization. By changing the design parameters to include multiple radiation shielding properties (stopping power, fragmentation cross-section, secondary radiation production) simultaneously, the system maintains reliability for specific applications while gaining adaptability to optimize for different radiation environments and mission requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material strategies by combining multiple elements and compounds in optimized ratios to achieve superior radiation shielding across multiple parameters. This composite approach allows simultaneous optimization of stopping power, fragmentation resistance, and secondary radiation management, improving both reliability and adaptability compared to single-material empirical designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12537076B2Computer implemented engineering materials mechanical property based search method
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 EMTDLAB SPACE DIVISION SA
  • US12537076B2 patent drawing
  • US12537076B2 patent drawing
  • US12537076B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention pertains to the field of computer implemented or computer aided methods for systematic search (contrary to trial and error) for materials (material science, material informatics) in relation to structural/mechanical properties and preferably both radiation shielding and structural/mechanical properties.