AI Matriculation Prediction Model for Applicant Text Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current admission processes rely heavily on quantitative metrics like GPA and standardized test scores, which can lead to unconscious bias and fail to accurately predict an applicant's likelihood of accepting and matriculating at an institution, resulting in inefficient applicant evaluation and increased application volumes.

Innovation Solution

A predictive AI model utilizing natural language processing evaluates application text to forecast matriculation likelihood, focusing on custom data workflows and unique training data to predict acceptance and matriculation probabilities without relying on traditional metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If institutions rely on traditional quantitative metrics (GPA, test scores) for applicant evaluation, then the evaluation process is simple and efficient, but the prediction accuracy of matriculation likelihood is insufficient and unconscious bias occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracy of matriculation likelihoodVSAvoidevaluation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical evaluation methods (human review of quantitative metrics) with an AI-based natural language processing system that automatically analyzes application essays and communications to predict matriculation likelihood, thereby improving prediction accuracy while reducing human bias

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an AI model as an intermediary between application data and admission decisions, which processes natural language text from applications and generates predicted probabilities of matriculation, serving as a bridge that enhances evaluation precision without requiring complex human judgment processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If institutions review all applicants thoroughly using additional sources (interviews, letters of recommendation, personal statements), then the quality of applicant assessment improves, but the time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of applicant assessmentVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis by having the AI model evaluate natural language text from application materials to predict matriculation likelihood before the full admissions review process, allowing institutions to prioritize candidates who are most likely to accept offers and reduce time spent on applicants with low predicted probabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using the AI model to assess specific key text elements (essays, communications) rather than requiring complete manual review of all application materials, achieving reliable predictions with reduced evaluation effort and time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If institutions extend offers to more applicants to increase enrollment, then the potential matriculation pool increases, but the number of rejected offers and wasted resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenrollment efficiencyVSAvoidwasted resources on rejected offers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from the AI model's predicted probabilities to guide offer extension decisions, allowing institutions to adjust their offer strategy based on predicted matriculation likelihood and optimize the balance between extending enough offers to meet enrollment targets and minimizing wasted resources on unlikely acceptances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of offer extension from a uniform approach to a differentiated approach based on predicted matriculation probability, enabling institutions to optimize offer strategies by targeting candidates with higher predicted acceptance rates and reducing offers to candidates with lower probabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230115917A1Predicting applicant/candidate acceptance and matriculation from a particular institution
Publication Date: 2023.04.13 VETTD INC
  • US20230115917A1 patent drawing
  • US20230115917A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system provides the ability to predict the likelihood that applicants would accept admission into and matriculate at a given institution based on all or a portion of the natural-language text in their application. An embodiment evaluates an individual application to an institution and analyzes the natural-language text sections of the application to predict whether the applicant would or would not be likely to accept and matriculate at a specific institution.