Matrix Conveyor Sortation System for High-Volume Package Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current package sortation systems, such as tilt tray and cross belt systems, face inefficiencies in processing high volumes of packages for next-day or overnight delivery, including limitations in throughput, adaptability, and reliability, along with high maintenance costs and space requirements.

Innovation Solution

A conveyor system with a matrix of intersecting belt or chain conveyors allows for simultaneous sorting and delivery of multiple packages across different directions, utilizing transfer conveyors and sensors to optimize article transfer and orientation, enabling continuous operation and increased throughput without significant increases in speed or complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional tilt tray or cross belt sortation systems are used, then packages can be sorted and distributed, but the processing speed and throughput are insufficient for high volume next-day delivery requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting capacityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the sortation function into multiple independent transpositors positioned along the conveyor, each capable of depositing articles onto separate lanes. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple articles simultaneously, dramatically increasing throughput without requiring each individual transfer to occur at extremely high speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from linear sequential sortation to a two-dimensional matrix arrangement where articles can be deposited onto multiple lanes from different transpositor positions. This dimensional change enables simultaneous multi-directional sorting,大幅提升处理容量而无需提高单一转移速度

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If more transpositors and conveyor lanes are added to increase throughput, then sorting capacity improves, but the system complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each transpositor is designed as a multi-functional unit that can deposit articles onto any of the multiple lanes, rather than being dedicated to a single lane. This universality means that the same hardware component performs multiple sorting functions, reducing the total number of specialized components needed and simplifying the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The transpositors are positioned on movable carriages that can dynamically adjust their positions along the conveyor. This dynamic positioning allows the system to reconfigure the number and arrangement of lanes based on demand, optimizing throughput without permanently installing complex fixed infrastructure for maximum capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If the conveyor system operates continuously at high volume, then productivity increases, but downtime for maintenance and article retrieval becomes more significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing volumeVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system includes preliminary detection mechanisms that identify articles requiring special handling (such as mis-introduced articles) before they cause problems downstream. This preliminary action allows for proactive intervention and reduces unexpected stoppages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Height-adjustable conveyors serve as intermediary elements between the transpositors and the final delivery lanes. These intermediaries can be adjusted to accommodate articles of varying heights and can be raised or lowered to facilitate maintenance access without stopping the entire system, thereby reducing downtime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Speed

If the sortation system is designed for high speed operation, then next-day delivery requirements are met, but the system becomes less adaptable to fluctuations in demand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating speedVSAvoiddemand adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The transpositors are mounted on movable carriages that can be dynamically repositioned along the conveyor, and the number of active lanes can be adjusted based on demand. This dynamic configuration allows the system to scale its capacity up or down as needed, maintaining high speed operation when demand is high while reducing complexity when demand is low

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system is divided into independent, modular transpositor units that can be individually activated or deactivated. This segmentation allows flexible configuration where only the necessary number of transpositors and lanes are operated at any given time, providing adaptability to fluctuating demand while maintaining the capability for high-speed operation when fully activated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9604258B2Sortation systems and related methods
Publication Date: 2017.03.28 SPAN TECH LLC
  • US9604258B2 patent drawing
  • US9604258B2 patent drawing
  • US9604258B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A conveying system for intended use in sorting articles and related methods of conveying and sorting articles are disclosed. In one embodiment, the system comprises a first conveyor extending in a first direction and a second conveyor extending in a second direction, with the directions intersecting. A transfer conveyor, such as a transpositor conveyor, may be provided for transferring articles from one of the first conveyors to one of the second conveyors. The system may be used to sort articles delivered from one or more storage locations for distribution, or may instead be used to sort articles for delivery to one or more storage locations. Related aspects and methods are also described.