Matrix LED Lighting Apparatus Hybrid Driving Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lightening apparatuses with LED elements arranged in a matrix face challenges in size reduction and luminous intensity when using dynamic driving methods, as they require fewer voltage lines but result in decreased luminous periods and intensity with increased rows, and static methods require more voltage lines, increasing size.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus employs a hybrid driving method with multiple reference and drive voltage lines, where at least two reference voltage lines and 'n' drive voltage lines are used, with a dynamic driving method for one set and either dynamic or static for another, allowing for time-divisional switching to maintain luminous intensity across multiple rows without increasing voltage lines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the dynamic driving method is used with increased rows of LED elements, then the number of voltage lines is reduced, but the luminous period and luminous intensity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of voltage linesVSAvoidluminous intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the LED matrix into multiple independently controllable groups (first matrix with m1 rows, second matrix with m2 rows, etc.). Each group has its own reference voltage lines and drive voltage lines, allowing parallel operation. This segmentation enables the system to maintain short luminous periods for each group while still covering a large total number of rows, thus preserving both low line complexity and high luminous intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimensional approach by organizing LED elements into multiple independent matrices rather than a single large matrix. This dimensional reorganization allows the system to achieve the equivalent of driving many more rows without proportionally increasing the number of voltage lines, as each matrix operates independently with its own simplified addressing scheme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Illumination intensity

If the static driving method is used, then the luminous intensity is maintained, but the number of voltage lines increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveluminous intensityVSAvoidnumber of voltage lines
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the LED array into multiple independent matrices, each driven by its own reference voltage lines and drive voltage lines. This segmentation allows the system to use static driving within each small matrix (maintaining full luminous intensity) while avoiding the need for a large number of voltage lines that would be required if static driving were applied to the entire large matrix.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple independently driven matrices to create a large-scale LED lighting system. By merging several small matrices (each with manageable voltage line requirements) into a unified system, the patent achieves both low voltage line complexity and high luminous intensity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Area of stationary object

If the number of rows of LED elements is increased in a single matrix, then the coverage area is expanded, but the luminous period decreases when using dynamic driving

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidluminous period
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments a large number of rows into multiple smaller matrices (first matrix with m1 rows, second matrix with m2 rows, etc.). Each matrix can be driven with a sufficiently long luminous period while the combined coverage area equals that of a single large matrix. This segmentation allows the system to expand coverage area without sacrificing luminous period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous useful action by operating multiple matrices in parallel, where each matrix contributes to the overall illumination. This parallel operation maintains continuous light output across the entire coverage area, preventing any reduction in effective luminous period that would occur if a single large matrix were driven sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP2911478B1Lightening apparatus having matrix-arranged light-emitting elements
Publication Date: 2018.12.26 STANLEY ELECTRIC CO LTD
  • EP2911478B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2911478B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2911478B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A lightening apparatus includes light-emitting elements (P1,1, P1,2, ···) arranged in a matrix. One of the light-emitting elements (P2,1,P2,2, ···) is located at each intersection between at least two first reference voltage lines (S2, S5) and "m" first drive voltage lines (Y1, Y2, ···). A first reference voltage driver (3) time-divisionally switches the first reference voltage lines (S2, S5). A first drive voltage driver (6) supplies first luminous drive voltages (B1, B2, ···; E1, E2, ···) to the first drive voltage lines (Y1, Y2, ···). One of the light-emitting elements (P1,1,P1,2,···, P3,1,P3,2,···; P4,1,P4,2, ···) is located at each intersection between at least one second reference voltage line (S1, S3; S4) and "m" second drive voltage lines (X1, X2, ···; Z1, Z2, ···). A second reference voltage driver (2, 4) switches the second reference voltage line (S1, S3; S4). A second drive voltage driver (5, 7) supplies second luminous drive voltages (A1, A2, ···, C1, C2, ···; D1, D2, ···) to the second drive voltage lines (X1, X2, ···; Z1, Z2, ···).