Matrix User Interface for Multi-Source LLM Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing generative models, such as large language models (LLMs), are limited by their context window, requiring multiple prompts for large documents, and standard chat interfaces restrict complex reasoning to single-line tasks, making it difficult to analyze multiple sources effectively.

Innovation Solution

A grid-based data structure and matrix user interface that allows systematic application of column prompts across multiple sources, overcoming context window limitations by breaking documents into chunks and iteratively generating context window prompts, with automated prompt generation and integration with chat interfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single chat interface is used to interact with LLM, then the interface is simple to use, but it becomes ineffective for performing multiple prompts across multiple sources of data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface simplicityVSAvoidability to perform multiple prompts across multiple sources
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the analysis task into multiple independent columns, each representing a different prompt or analysis dimension. Each column can be independently configured and executed across multiple sources, allowing parallel processing while maintaining interface simplicity. The grid-based layout naturally organizes these segmented tasks into a scalable structure that handles complexity without overwhelming the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single-dimensional chat interface to a two-dimensional grid interface where rows represent sources and columns represent prompts. This dimensional expansion enables simultaneous visualization and management of multiple prompts across multiple sources, transforming a sequential single-task interface into a parallel multi-task system while preserving ease of use through intuitive visual organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the context window of LLM is used to analyze large documents, then the model can process information, but it slows down exponentially for each amount of data added

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis capabilityVSAvoidinference time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments large documents into smaller chunks that fit within the LLM's context window. Each chunk is processed independently through dedicated columns in the grid, allowing parallel processing of multiple segments. This segmentation approach maintains analysis reliability by ensuring each prompt receives sufficient context while dramatically reducing inference time by avoiding exponential scaling with document size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing documents into manageable chunks and pre-configuring multiple analysis columns before execution. This preparation work is done offline, allowing the actual LLM inference to operate on smaller, pre-segmented data units, thereby reducing real-time inference time while maintaining comprehensive analysis capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If multiple prompts are applied to multiple sources systematically, then comprehensive analysis is achieved, but the complexity of managing prompts and sources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive data analysis capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity for managing prompts and sources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of multi-prompt multi-source analysis into independent, configurable columns where each column represents a single prompt configuration. This segmentation allows users to manage complexity by working with one prompt at a time in each column while the grid structure automatically handles the combinatorial complexity of applying all columns across all rows (sources), achieving comprehensive analysis without overwhelming system or user complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The grid-based system provides universal functionality where each column can be independently configured to perform different analysis tasks across the same set of sources, and each row (source) can be universally applied across all columns. This multi-functional design allows the same infrastructure to handle diverse analysis scenarios without requiring separate systems for each prompt-source combination, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive analytical capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12393788B2Matrix user interface for LLM-powered data analysis and generation
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 HEBBIA INC
  • US12393788B2 patent drawing
  • US12393788B2 patent drawing
  • US12393788B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A data analytics system uses a grid-based data structure to improve the usability of LLMs in the analysis of large data sets, to synthesize information for use in other generative AI contexts, and to improve a user's ability to interface with an LLM. A grid-based data structure is a data structure or database that stores the results of column prompts applied to sources. The grid-based data structure may store the results in a relational manner. For example, a grid-based data structure may have rows that correspond to sources (e.g., documents, files, or databases) and columns that correspond to prompts. Each cell of the grid-based data structure stores the output of the column prompt applied to a source using an LLM. Thus, each column prompt may be systematically applied to each source to generate information based on the sources in an organized way.