Matrix Sorter Lane Balancing for Variable Unit Load Sorting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Matrix sorters face inefficiencies due to overloading or underutilization of sorting lanes, particularly when handling items with variable dimensions, leading to reduced capacity and increased space and cost requirements.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines sorting values based on the number of items and the sorting algorithm before the sorting process, ensuring a predetermined upper and/or lower limit of items per sorting lane, optimizing the distribution of items across all sorting stages without modifying the sorter's structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the sorting lane is designed based on the largest dimensions of individual items, then the capacity of individual sorting lanes is maintained, but the space requirements and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting lane capacityVSAvoidspace requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of item dimensions by introducing virtual items with reduced dimensions that represent multiple physical items. This allows the sorting lane to be designed for smaller virtual items, reducing space requirements while maintaining the ability to handle larger physical items through the virtual representation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates virtual copies of physical items in the sorting lane. Multiple physical items are represented by a single virtual item with reduced dimensions, allowing the sorting lane to accommodate more items without increasing physical space requirements. The virtual items are processed through the sorting lane and then mapped back to physical items for output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If the number of sorting stages and sorting lanes is increased, then the sorting capacity is improved, but the system complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses virtual items to represent multiple physical items in the sorting lane. This allows a single sorting stage with a fixed number of sorting lanes to handle a larger number of physical items by processing virtual representations, thereby increasing sorting capacity without adding physical sorting stages or lanes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the sorting process into virtual and physical domains. Virtual items are processed through the sorting lane independently, and then multiple virtual items are mapped to physical items for output. This segmentation allows the physical sorting infrastructure to remain simple while achieving high sorting capacity through virtual processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If items with variable dimensions are conveyed, then the adaptability of the system is improved, but the capacity of individual sorting lanes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to variable dimensionsVSAvoidsorting lane capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of item dimensions by introducing virtual items with standardized reduced dimensions that represent physical items of various sizes. This allows the sorting lane to maintain a fixed capacity designed for small virtual items while accommodating physical items of variable dimensions through the virtual representation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates virtual copies of physical items with standardized dimensions regardless of the original item's size. This allows the sorting lane to maintain consistent capacity specifications while handling diverse physical items, as all items are represented by virtual items with uniform dimensional parameters for sorting purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP4671156A1Sorting method for matrix sorter
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 DURKOPP FORDERTECHN
  • EP4671156A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1c
  • EP4671156A1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c
  • EP4671156A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for sorting unit loads (10) in a conveyor system. The unit loads (10) are guided along conveyor tracks and each receives a sorting value (25, 26) which determines the order of the unit loads after sorting. From a common feed track (4), the unit loads are conveyed through several sorting stages (1, 2, 3), wherein the unit loads are directed at each sorting stage (1, 2, 3) onto one of several alternative sorting tracks (1a, 2a, 3a). The assignment to the sorting tracks is based on the sorting values ​​(25, 26), which are evaluated by a sorting algorithm.The sorting values ​​(25, 26) are determined before conveying to the sorting stages (1, 2, 3) depending on the number of items (10) to be sorted and the sorting algorithm, so that in each sorting stage (1, 2, 3) the maximum number of items (10) on each sorting lane corresponds to a predetermined upper limit and/or the minimum number of items (10) corresponds to a predetermined lower limit.