Uni-Directional Mattress Rigidifier for Sofa Bed Comfort and Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Sofa bed mattresses with foldable designs face challenges in maintaining optimal tension and comfort, as they can become either too hard or too soft, affecting user comfort in both sofa and bed modes, and existing tension members fail to provide adequate support and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

Uni-directional arcuate tension members with a U-shaped cross-section and lateral slits are used, which flex in the sofa mode to provide comfort and stiffen in the bed mode by closing slits when a load is applied, ensuring optimal support and comfort in both configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional tension members are used in sofa bed mattresses, then the mattress can provide some support, but it cannot maintain optimal tension and comfort in both sofa and bed modes simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different modes (sofa and bed)VSAvoidsupport quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tension member incorporates lateral slits that allow the structure to dynamically change its mechanical properties based on loading direction. In sofa mode, the slits open to allow flexing; in bed mode, the slits close to prevent flexing, providing adaptive support for different usage scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The tension member has non-uniform structural properties due to the lateral slits, creating different mechanical characteristics in different regions and orientations. The slits are positioned and oriented to provide specific flexing behavior in the sofa mode while maintaining rigidity in the bed mode

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the mattress is made softer for comfort in sofa mode, then seating comfort improves, but support quality deteriorates in bed mode

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseating comfortVSAvoidsupport quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The tension member transitions between two dynamic states based on orientation: in sofa mode, the structure allows controlled flexing for comfort; in bed mode, the same structure becomes rigid to provide support, with the lateral slits closing under load to prevent excessive deformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If the mattress is made harder for support in bed mode, then support quality improves, but seating comfort deteriorates in sofa mode

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport qualityVSAvoidseating comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tension member's mechanical properties are dynamically adjusted by its orientation and loading condition. The lateral slits enable the structure to be soft when needed (sofa mode with slits open) and hard when needed (bed mode with slits closed), resolving the contradiction between comfort and support

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional tension members are used, then manufacturing is simple, but they fail to provide adequate differential support for dual-mode usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddifferential support capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The tension member is segmented by lateral slits that divide the continuous structure into sections. This segmentation allows independent movement and flexing of each section, enabling the overall structure to provide differential support characteristics for different usage modes while remaining manufacturable from sheet material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the structural parameters of the tension member by introducing lateral slits, which fundamentally alter the mechanical behavior from uniform rigidity to directional adaptability, enabling differential support for sofa and bed modes while maintaining conventional manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides enhanced comfort and support in both sofa and bed modes by allowing the tension members to flex in the sofa position and stiffen in the bed position, preventing sagging and maintaining mattress posture, thus improving user experience and extending mattress life.

Implementation Method 1

When the mattress is in the sofa mode and an individual sits thereon, the tension members will flex and the lateral slits therealong will open for seating comfort

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

When the mattress is in the bed mode and an individual lies thereon, the tension members will stiffen and the lateral slits therealong will close to prevent further flexing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9185991B2Uni-directional rigidifier and method
Publication Date: 2015.11.17 COZY COMFORT LLC
  • US9185991B2 patent drawing
  • US9185991B2 patent drawing
  • US9185991B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A uni-directional rigidifier for a foldable mattress for use in sofa beds has an arcuate, elongated shape. Lateral slits along the rigidifier allow it to easily flex when a load is applied while in an upright position. When the rigidifier is in an inverted position, an applied load causes the slits to close and the rigidifier to stiffen. The method describes the use of the uni-directional rigidifier in a foldable sofa bed mattress.