MBR Wastewater Tank Segmentation for Area and Aeration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing organic wastewater treatment systems using the MBR method face challenges in maintaining efficiency and reducing installation area, particularly due to increased aeration power requirements and complex maintenance procedures when membrane separation devices are installed in deep tanks, and insufficient space for diffusers at high MLSS concentrations.

Innovation Solution

The system divides the treatment tank into upper and lower spaces using a top-bottom partition member, with anoxic tanks in the lower space and aerobic tanks with immersion-type membrane separation devices in the upper space, allowing for efficient denitrification and nitrification processes while reducing the installation area and simplifying maintenance by using denitrifying and nitrifying liquid transfer paths to circulate activated sludge throughout the tank.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If membrane separation devices are installed in deep aerobic tanks to reduce installation area, then the installation area is reduced, but the aeration power requirement increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation areaVSAvoidaeration power
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment tank is divided into multiple aerobic tanks arranged in series, with membrane separation devices installed in each tank. This segmentation allows the system to achieve the required treatment capacity without installing membranes in a single deep tank, thereby reducing the aeration power requirement while maintaining a compact footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of increasing water depth vertically to reduce area, the system extends horizontally by arranging multiple aerobic tanks in series. This dimensional transition allows membrane separation devices to be installed in shallower tanks, reducing aeration power requirements while achieving the same treatment capacity in a compact configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If MLSS concentration is increased to improve treatment efficiency, then treatment efficiency is improved, but space for diffusers becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficiencyVSAvoidspace for diffusers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the treatment process into multiple aerobic tanks, allowing diffusers to be distributed across multiple compartments. This segmentation provides sufficient space for diffusers in each tank even at high MLSS concentrations, while maintaining overall treatment efficiency through the series configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Area of stationary object

If water depth is increased to reduce installation area, then installation area is reduced, but maintenance complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation areaVSAvoidmaintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment tank is segmented into multiple shallower aerobic tanks with membrane separation devices installed in each. This segmentation maintains water depth at manageable levels, facilitating easier maintenance operations while achieving compact installation area through horizontal arrangement of multiple tanks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces the installation area without increasing aeration load and simplifies maintenance by allowing efficient denitrification and nitrification processes, effectively treating organic wastewater while minimizing equipment costs and operational complexity.

Implementation Method 1

a membrane separation device for membrane-separating the water to be treated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMembrane separation: Semipermeable Membrane

Implementation Method 2

an organic wastewater treatment apparatus which biologically treats organic wastewater containing nitrogen in activated sludge in a treatment tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDenitrification: Anaerobic Digestion

Implementation Method 3

a plurality of aerobic tanks formed in the upper space of the treatment tank, each aerobic tank being provided with an immersion-type membrane separation device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNitrification: Aerobic Digestion

Data Source

PatentUS11731891B2Organic wastewater treatment apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 KUBOTA CORP
  • US11731891B2 patent drawing
  • US11731891B2 patent drawing
  • US11731891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An organic wastewater treatment apparatus biologically treats organic wastewater containing nitrogen using a treatment tank storing activated sludge. A top-bottom partition member divides the treatment tank in into an upper space and a lower space. A plurality of anoxic tanks are formed in the lower space, while a plurality of aerobic tanks, each of which having an immersion-type membrane separation device, are formed in the upper space. A raw water supply path divides and supplies the organic wastewater to each anoxic tank. A plurality of denitrifying liquid transfer paths repeatedly transfers the activated sludge from the anoxic tanks to the aerobic tanks, while a plurality of nitrifying liquid transfer paths repeatedly transfer the activated sludge from the aerobic tanks to the anoxic tanks, whereby the activated sludge is circulated throughout the treatment tank.