MBSFN Subframe Dynamic Allocation for Interference Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling the use of MBSFN subframes in base stations require semi-fixed notifications, leading to reduced standby time and inefficient resource utilization, especially in variable data traffic scenarios like voice communication.

Innovation Solution

A base station configuration that dynamically determines the use of MBSFN subframes for either multicast transmission or inter-cell interference coordination based on the presence or absence of transmission data, allowing flexible switching without reducing resource utilization efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If base stations use semi-fixed notification via SIB to control MBSFN subframe switching, then inter-cell interference coordination can be implemented, but terminal standby time is reduced and resource utilization efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinter-cell interference coordinationVSAvoidterminal standby time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by enabling flexible switching between multicast transmission and interference coordination modes in MBSFN subframes. Instead of semi-fixed notification, the system dynamically determines the function of each MBSFN subframe based on whether data needs to be transmitted, allowing terminals to remain in standby state longer while maintaining reliable interference coordination when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of MBSFN subframes by introducing a dynamic determination mechanism. The system adjusts the function of MBSFN subframes based on data transmission needs, transitioning between multicast mode and interference coordination mode without requiring semi-fixed notifications, thereby preserving terminal standby time while maintaining coordination reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If base stations frequently notify SIB updates to switch MBSFN subframe usage, then multicast transmission can be flexibly controlled, but terminal resource consumption increases and standby state is disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulticast transmission control flexibilityVSAvoidterminal energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic control of MBSFN subframe functionality based on actual data transmission requirements. The base station determines whether each MBSFN subframe should be used for multicast transmission or interference coordination in real-time, enabling flexible multicast control without frequent SIB notifications, thus reducing terminal energy consumption while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The base station autonomously determines the appropriate function for each MBSFN subframe based on its own data transmission needs without requiring frequent notifications to terminals. This self-service approach allows the system to adapt multicast transmission control internally, reducing the burden on terminals and their energy consumption while preserving flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If MBSFN subframes are used for interference avoidance by stopping data transmission, then inter-cell interference is reduced, but resource utilization efficiency decreases due to semi-fixed allocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinter-cell interferenceVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic allocation of MBSFN subframes for interference coordination based on actual data transmission needs. Instead of semi-fixed allocation where resources remain idle, the system dynamically determines whether each MBSFN subframe should perform interference coordination or multicast transmission, reducing inter-cell interference only when necessary and improving overall resource utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational state of MBSFN subframes from semi-fixed to dynamic based on data transmission requirements. When data needs to be transmitted, the subframe operates in multicast mode; when interference coordination is needed, it switches to coordination mode. This parameter change eliminates wasted resources while maintaining interference reduction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10341821B2Base station and transmission method
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US10341821B2 patent drawing
  • US10341821B2 patent drawing
  • US10341821B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Multicast transmission and inter-cell interference coordination can be flexibly switched using Multicast-Broadcast Single Frequency Network (MBSFN) subframe without reduction of resource utilization efficiency. A transmission data determination unit determines that a first area is used as either of a first subframe performing multicast transmission or a second subframe performing inter-cell interference coordination based on presence or absence of transmission data in each of the first area which is configured to have at least some subframes among a plurality of MBSFN subframes. Wireless communication IF unit performs a transmission process in the first area according to a determination result.