Monochloroacetic Acid Purification via Catalyst Enhancer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing processes for purifying monochloroacetic acid are hindered by catalyst deactivation in hydrodechlorination reactions, leading to decreased conversion efficiency and increased production costs due to the quick deactivation of noble metal catalysts used in the production of monochloroacetic acid, resulting in significant downtime and by-product formation.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a catalyst enhancer comprising a salt of non-noble metals such as nickel, cobalt, or iron into the hydrodechlorination process to prolong catalyst activity and reduce deactivation, thereby maintaining higher conversion efficiency and reducing downtime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If noble metal catalysts are used in hydrodechlorination reactions, then conversion efficiency is improved, but catalyst deactivation occurs quickly leading to increased downtime and production loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidcatalyst downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-treating the noble metal catalyst with a solution containing non-noble metal salts (such as iron, nickel, or cobalt chlorides) before use. This pre-treatment modifies the catalyst surface in advance to reduce deactivation during the hydrodechlorination reaction, thereby maintaining higher conversion efficiency over extended periods and reducing downtime for catalyst replacement or regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If reaction temperature is increased to counter catalyst deactivation, then catalyst activity is maintained, but energy costs increase and by-product formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidenergy costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the chemical composition parameters of the catalyst through pre-treatment with non-noble metal salt solutions. This changes the surface properties and catalytic characteristics of the noble metal catalyst, allowing it to maintain activity at lower temperatures. As a result, energy costs are reduced while avoiding excessive by-product formation that would occur at higher temperatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If reaction temperature is increased to maintain catalyst activity, then catalyst deactivation is countered, but by-product formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidby-product formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the chemical parameters of the catalyst by pre-treating it with non-noble metal salts, which alters the surface composition and electronic properties. This enables the catalyst to maintain its activity at moderate temperatures, thereby preventing the formation of unwanted by-products such as aldehydes and condensation products that form at elevated temperatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If catalyst is replaced due to deactivation, then fresh catalyst activity is restored, but unit downtime increases and production is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidproduction output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-modifying the catalyst with non-noble metal salts before deployment. This preliminary treatment creates a more stable catalyst that resists deactivation, thereby extending the operational cycle and reducing the frequency of catalyst replacement. This maintains continuous production with minimal interruptions, preserving overall production output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

5Manufacturing precision

If distillation is used to remove DCA from MCA, then separation is achieved, but costs are high and time consumption is significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification levelVSAvoidpurification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical separation system (distillation) with a chemical conversion system (hydrodechlorination). Instead of physically separating DCA from MCA through energy-intensive distillation, the process uses a catalyst to chemically convert DCA into MCA through hydrodechlorination. This substitution dramatically reduces both time and energy costs while achieving the desired purification level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

6Manufacturing precision

If crystallization is used to reduce DCA concentration, then partial purification is achieved, but multiple stages are required and mother liquor becomes waste

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDCA concentration reductionVSAvoidnumber of crystallization stages
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the multi-stage mechanical crystallization process with a single-stage chemical hydrodechlorination process. Instead of requiring multiple crystallization stages to achieve adequate DCA reduction, the catalytic conversion method achieves superior purification in one step. Additionally, the mother liquor issue is eliminated because the chemical conversion transforms DCA into valuable MCA product rather than creating unusable waste streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of non-noble metal salts as catalyst enhancers significantly prolongs catalyst activity, decreases side product formation, and extends production cycles, leading to more efficient and cost-effective purification of monochloroacetic acid by reducing catalyst deactivation and maintaining higher conversion rates.

Implementation Method 1

a heterogeneous hydrogenation catalyst comprising a Group VIII noble metal on a carrier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

catalytic hydrodechlorination step by contacting it with a source of hydrogen to convert dichloroacetic acid into monochloroacetic acid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentEP3271322B1Process for the purification of monochloroacetic acid
Publication Date: 2019.12.04 AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS INTERNATIONAL BV
  • EP3271322B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The present invention pertains to a process for the purification of a feed comprising monochloroacetic acid and dichloroacetic acid wherein the feed is subjected to a catalytic hydrodechlorination step by contacting it with a source of hydrogen to convert dichloroacetic acid into monochloroacetic acid in the presence of a solid heterogeneous hydrogenation catalyst comprising a Group VIII noble metal on a carrier under hydrodechlorination conditions, wherein the reaction is carried out in the presence ofacatalyst enhancer which comprises a salt of a metal selected from the group of non-noble metals of Group VIII, Group VIB, Group VIIB, and Group IIB. It was found that the presence of a catalyst enhancer leads to reduced deactivation of the catalyst and/or increased activity of the spent catalyst. This allows longer production cycles, less downtime, and lower formation of side products. The catalyst enhancer preferably comprises one or more salts of one or more of nickel, cobalt, or iron, more in particular of iron. The salts preferably comprise one or more of chloride salts and acetate salts.