MCC Closed Door Operation Push Button Interlock Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor control center (MCC) units lack effective safety mechanisms to prevent electrical hazards during installation, servicing, or removal, as operators may inadvertently expose themselves to power buses due to inadequate interlock systems.

Innovation Solution

A closed door operation (CDO) racking device with interlock mechanisms that require the door to be closed and a specific push-button sequence to be performed before allowing the racking operation, ensuring safe connection or disconnection of electrical devices from the power bus, utilizing a racking operator assembly and a push-button interlock assembly with spring-loaded locker and operator components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional unit interlock mechanisms are used to prevent contact with power bus, then operator safety is improved, but the complexity of the interlock system increases and requires multiple mechanical components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidinterlock system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential interlock function from complex mechanical systems and implements it through a simplified door switch mechanism. The door switch directly controls the racking operator enablement, eliminating the need for multiple mechanical interlock components while maintaining safety by preventing racking operations when the door is open.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a door switch as an intermediary element that mediates between the door state and the racking operator enablement. This simple binary switch acts as the intermediary that translates door position into operational permission, replacing complex mechanical interlock chains with a single clear control signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If advance/retract handle mechanisms are used to retract stabs before insertion, then electrical hazard prevention is improved, but the operation time and procedural complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical hazard preventionVSAvoidoperation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by requiring the door to be closed before enabling racking operations. This preliminary door closure action ensures that the enclosure is sealed and protective before any electrical connection operations occur, preventing electrical hazards in advance while simplifying the procedure compared to multiple mechanical handle operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring manual retraction of stabs through advance/retract handles before insertion, the patent inverts the approach by using the door closure state to control operational enablement. The system waits for the door to be closed first, then allows the racking operation to proceed, reversing the traditional sequence of manual stab retraction followed by insertion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If multiple interlock conditions are required for racking operations, then safety is improved, but the ease of operation decreases due to complex push-button sequences

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidracking operation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple safety conditions into a single door switch control mechanism. Instead of requiring separate verification of multiple interlock conditions through complex push-button sequences, the system combines door closure status, enclosure integrity, and operational enablement into a single unified control point, simplifying the operator's task while maintaining comprehensive safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The door switch serves multiple functions simultaneously: it monitors door closure, controls racking operator enablement, and prevents unauthorized operations. This multi-functional element replaces what would otherwise require multiple separate interlock mechanisms and verification steps, improving ease of operation while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10672567B2MCC closed door operation (CDO) push button interlock mechanism
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA INC
  • US10672567B2 patent drawing
  • US10672567B2 patent drawing
  • US10672567B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A closed door operation racking device is provided for racking a circuit breaker to and from a power bus from outside of a housing of a motor control center unit. The racking device includes a racking operator assembly and a push-button interlock assembly. The racking operator is configured to rack-in the electrical device and connect the stabs to a power bus in a connected position and to rack-out the electrical device and disconnect the stabs from the power bus in a disconnected position. The push-button interlock assembly prevents the operation of the racking operator under certain conditions, and includes a spring-loaded locker assembly and a spring-loaded push-button operator assembly. A push-button operator of the push-button operator assembly is depressed to disengage the locker assembly from the racking operator to allow operation of the racking operator.