MCG Fast Recovery via Secondary Node Forwarding
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in fast recovery from master cell group (MCG) failures, which can lead to interruptions in data transmission and require time-consuming RRC reconfiguration procedures.
Innovation Solution
The implementation of a fast MCG recovery procedure, where the UE transmits an MCG failure information message to the secondary node (SN), which forwards it to the master node (MN), allowing for rapid recovery without interrupting data transmission and avoiding lengthy RRC reconfiguration processes.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If traditional RRC reconfiguration procedures are used for MCG failure recovery, then the network can restore connectivity, but the process is time-consuming and interrupts data transmission
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring the secondary node (SN) with recovery information before the MCG failure occurs. When failure is detected, the UE can immediately use the pre-configured SN to establish a backup connection without waiting for complex RRC reconfiguration procedures, thus reducing recovery time while maintaining reliability
Solution Approach 2:
The secondary node acts as an intermediary in the failure recovery process. Instead of directly reconfiguring the master node through lengthy RRC procedures, the patent uses the SN as a mediator to provide alternative connectivity paths, enabling faster recovery by bypassing the traditional time-consuming reconfiguration process
2Productivity
If fast recovery procedure is implemented using secondary node, then data transmission continuity is improved, but the complexity of failure detection and node coordination increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies self-service by enabling the UE to autonomously detect MCG failures and initiate recovery procedures without extensive network intervention. The UE monitors its own connection status, detects failures, and triggers the appropriate recovery mechanism, reducing the complexity burden on the network side while maintaining data transmission continuity
Solution Approach 2:
The failure recovery mechanism is segmented into distinct functional components: failure detection module, recovery decision module, and execution module. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific tasks independently, reducing overall system complexity while enabling fast and reliable recovery through coordinated action of simplified modules
Data Source
AI summary
A UE communicating in DC with an MN and an SN detects a master cell group (MCG) failure associated with the MN. In response to detecting the MCG failure, the UE performs an MCG recovery procedure by transmitting an MCG failure information message to the SN, receiving an MCG failure recovery message from the SN, and transmitting an MCG failure recovery complete message to the MN.


