MD-Aware VM Placement for Cloud Maintenance Availability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cloud platforms, intelligently placing virtual machines (VMs) across compute nodes is crucial to maintain high availability and minimize downtime during rolling maintenance, while also balancing resource utilization and reducing the frequency of maintenance events.

Innovation Solution

An MD-aware VM-to-compute-node placement algorithm that considers Maintenance Domain (MD) mapping, customer-defined maintenance policies, and optimization metrics such as resource distribution, maintenance window balancing, and minimizing downtime, to ensure high availability and efficient maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If VMs are placed on compute nodes without considering maintenance domains, then resource utilization is optimized, but downtime increases during rolling maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveavailabilityVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments compute nodes into multiple maintenance domains (MDs) and places VMs across different MDs based on maintenance policies. This segmentation allows rolling maintenance to proceed with minimal downtime by ensuring not all VMs are on the same compute node, enabling staggered maintenance windows across different MDs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The placement algorithm performs preliminary action by considering future maintenance schedules when placing VMs initially. It proactively distributes VMs across compute nodes in a way that anticipates maintenance needs, ensuring that during any given maintenance window, only a subset of VMs will be affected, thereby reducing overall downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If rolling maintenance is performed on compute nodes, then hypervisor patching is achieved, but VM downtime occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveavailabilityVSAvoidmaintenance window
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the compute node population into multiple maintenance domains and intelligently distributing VMs across these domains, the system enables parallel maintenance operations. Different MDs can undergo maintenance simultaneously or in staggered fashion, reducing the total maintenance window while maintaining high availability through VM migration capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts maintenance scheduling based on VM placement and workload conditions. The placement algorithm considers maintenance policies and can dynamically migrate VMs between compute nodes to optimize maintenance windows, making the maintenance process adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If VMs are concentrated on fewer compute nodes, then resource utilization increases, but vulnerability to single points of failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidvulnerability to failure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The placement algorithm applies local quality by considering customer-specific maintenance policies and failure tolerance requirements when placing individual VMs. Different customers or VM clusters can have different placement strategies applied locally, allowing resource-efficient consolidation while maintaining appropriate redundancy for critical workloads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds the maintenance domain dimension to the traditional resource allocation problem. Instead of only considering compute node capacity, it distributes VMs across multiple dimensions (compute nodes, maintenance domains, customer policies), achieving both high resource utilization and fault tolerance by spreading VMs across diverse failure domains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If maintenance domains are increased to reduce downtime, then availability improves, but maintenance frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveavailabilityVSAvoidmaintenance frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by allowing customers to specify maintenance policies that balance availability requirements against maintenance frequency tolerances. Rather than maximizing MDs for all customers, the placement algorithm adjusts the degree of MD utilization based on individual customer policies, applying just enough segmentation to meet availability targets without unnecessarily increasing maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250094241A1Techniques for maintenance-domain-aware virtual machine placement in a cloud platform
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US20250094241A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094241A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094241A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Rolling maintenance involves partitioning the compute nodes of a host platform into multiple maintenance domains (MDs), and patching those MDs in a rolling fashion. Techniques are described herein for establishing the VM-to-compute-node placement in an “MD-aware” manner. Specifically, the VM-to-compute-node placement takes into account the MD-to-compute-node mapping, supports constraints and goals related to achieving the required levels of availability during rolling maintenance, and for any given customer, avoids having maintenance events (and corresponding notifications) at excessive frequencies.