Automatic Insulin Dosage via Meal Purpose Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automatic insulin delivery systems struggle with accurately detecting meals and determining their purpose, leading to potential under-delivery or over-delivery of insulin due to user error or difficulty in estimating carbohydrate intake.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a non-transitory computer readable medium with programming code executable by a processor to receive data from various data sources, including direct and indirect sources, to determine the purpose of a detected meal and generate appropriate insulin dosage instructions for a drug delivery device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If users manually input carbohydrate intake into the device, then the device can control therapy based on accurate meal information, but the process is time-consuming and complex for users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeal detection accuracyVSAvoiduser operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects meals using multiple data sources (glucose sensor data, activity data, location data) without requiring user input. The processor evaluates data from these sources to autonomously determine meal occurrence and purpose, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating the need for manual user operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual input system with an automated electronic detection system. Instead of users physically entering carbohydrate information, the system uses sensors, processors, and algorithms to automatically detect and analyze meal-related data from multiple indirect sources, substituting electronic automation for manual mechanical input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If users estimate carbohydrate content of meals, then they can provide meal information to the device, but estimation errors lead to under-delivery or over-delivery of insulin

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeal information accuracyVSAvoidcarbohydrate intake measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces multiple intermediary data sources between the user and the insulin delivery decision. Instead of relying directly on user estimation, the processor evaluates glucose sensor data, activity data, location data, and other indirect measurements as intermediaries to infer meal occurrence and characteristics, reducing reliance on potentially inaccurate user estimates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses glucose sensor data as feedback to verify and refine meal detection. By monitoring glucose level changes and comparing them against expected patterns, the system can confirm or adjust its meal detection conclusions, creating a feedback loop that improves measurement accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If the device controls all therapy automatically without meal purpose consideration, then therapy management is simplified, but the system cannot differentiate between different types of meals (e.g., rescue meals vs. regular meals)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapy control automationVSAvoidmeal purpose differentiation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its meal detection and classification based on real-time data evaluation. The processor analyzes multiple data sources and adapts its determination of meal purpose (rescue meal, preemptive meal, regular meal) based on the specific pattern of glucose changes, activity levels, and contextual information, allowing flexible adaptation to different meal scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the meal detection process into distinct analytical components: detecting glucose changes, evaluating activity data, analyzing location data, and determining meal purpose. This segmentation allows the system to automatically control therapy while simultaneously differentiating between various meal types by evaluating each segment independently and combining the results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12300375B2Early meal detection and calorie intake detection
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 INSULET CORP
  • US12300375B2 patent drawing
  • US12300375B2 patent drawing
  • US12300375B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are examples of a device, a system, methods and computer-readable medium products operable to implement functionality to determine and respond to a purpose of a meal. An algorithm or application may receive data that may include data related to a meal purpose from data sources and determine whether any of the data received from the plurality of data sources was received from a direct data source or an indirect data source. The data may be evaluated to determine a purpose of the meal. Based on the results of the evaluation, instructions may be generated to provide an appropriate response based on the determined purpose of the meal. The generated instructions to provide the appropriate response based on the determined purpose of the meal may be output.