Measurement Machine Validation Using Reference Part Tolerances

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for validating measurement machines are not adequately refined to account for changes in manufacturing processes and wear and tear, leading to suboptimal inspection accuracy and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a reference part with multiple validation measurements, including a first and second tolerance, to measure and compare errors, issuing a validation signal for inspection measurements on production parts when the error is within the second tolerance, ensuring the measurement machine's accuracy and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing validation methods are used, then the validation process is simple, but measurement accuracy and reliability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidvalidation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process is segmented into multiple distinct measurement steps (first measurement with first tolerance, second measurement with second tolerance) rather than a single validation step. This segmentation allows for more comprehensive accuracy verification while maintaining a structured, manageable process flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary validation measurements on a reference part before authorizing production inspections. By conducting these preliminary measurements with different tolerances, the system ensures measurement accuracy is verified in advance, preventing inaccurate measurements during actual production inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If measurement machines are used without rigorous validation, then productivity is maintained, but reliability of inspection results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection reliabilityVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation measurements on a reference part before authorizing production inspections. This preliminary action ensures measurement reliability is established in advance, allowing rapid authorization decisions that maintain productivity while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process provides feedback by comparing measurement values against nominal values and tolerances. This feedback mechanism determines whether the measurement machine is authorized for production inspections, creating a reliable gatekeeping process that maintains both inspection reliability and productivity through clear authorization criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If single-tolerance validation is used, then the validation process is quick, but measurement error detection capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process is divided into segmented measurement steps, each with specific tolerance criteria. The first measurement checks general accuracy while the second measurement with tighter tolerance verifies precision. This segmentation enables comprehensive error detection across different measurement ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes the tolerance parameter between measurement steps (first tolerance vs. second tolerance) to detect different types of measurement errors. By varying the tolerance parameter, the system can identify errors that would be missed with a single fixed tolerance threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11821758B2Validation of a measurement machine
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US11821758B2 patent drawing
  • US11821758B2 patent drawing
  • US11821758B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for validating a measurement machine. A group of validation measurements associated with a reference part is obtained. The group of validation measurements includes at least a first measurement associated with a first tolerance and a second measurement associated with a second tolerance, the second tolerance being smaller than the first tolerance. A dimension of the reference part associated with the first measurement is measured to obtain a measurement value. The measurement value is compared to a nominal value associated with the first measurement to obtain a measurement error. The measurement error is compared to the second tolerance associated with the second measurement. When the measurement error is less than the second tolerance, a validation signal is issued to the measurement machine.