Centralized Server for Measuring Machine Data Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the series production of identical parts, such as gearwheels, existing systems lack an efficient method to correlate and compare the performance and measurement results across multiple measuring machines, leading to potential inconsistencies and non-conforming workpieces being supplied to customers.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an intra-machine communication system that allows measuring machines of the same type to exchange information directly or through a central comparison module, enabling the correlation of measurement results and identification of differences, with optional analytical and recording software for error trend analysis and quality control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple measuring machines operate independently without communication, then each machine can function autonomously, but measurement inconsistencies and quality control issues arise across the production line

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a server as an intermediary component that receives measurement data from multiple measuring machines, performs centralized correlation and analysis, and generates quality assessments. This mediator enables consistent quality control across all machines without requiring direct complex interconnections between each measuring machine, thus improving measurement consistency while managing system complexity through a centralized architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If a centralized comparison module is used to correlate measurement data from all measuring machines, then measurement differences can be automatically detected, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual or mechanical comparison methods with automated electronic data processing. The server uses software-based correlation algorithms to automatically compare measurement data from multiple machines, identifying deviations and quality issues without manual intervention. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with electronic automation improves quality control accuracy while managing complexity through standardized digital workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If measuring machines exchange information directly among each other, then real-time quality monitoring is achieved, but communication infrastructure and synchronization requirements increase complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality monitoring efficiencyVSAvoidcommunication infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the data collection, correlation, and analysis functions into a single centralized server rather than distributing these functions across multiple measuring machines. This merging approach consolidates the communication infrastructure into a single hub-and-spoke model, where all machines communicate with the central server, simplifying the overall communication architecture compared to a mesh network where each machine would need to communicate with every other machine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9976932B2Method for operating a plurality of measuring machines and apparatus comprising multiple measuring machines
Publication Date: 2018.05.22 KLINGELNBERG AG
  • US9976932B2 patent drawing
  • US9976932B2 patent drawing
  • US9976932B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a plurality of measuring machines (20.1, 20.2), wherein measuring machines (20.1, 20.2) of the same type are concerned which are designed for the measurement of same parts (4), having the following steps: —measuring a first quantity of same parts (4) in a first measuring machine (20.1); —measuring a second quantity of same parts in a second measuring machine (20.2); —performing a comparison process, wherein within the scope of said comparison process at least one value (W1) of the first quantity is correlated with at least one respective value (W2) of the second quantity in order to determine therefrom; and deviations between measurements of the first measuring machine (20.1) and measurements of the second measuring machine (20.2).