Measuring System Component Grouping for Compatibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing measuring systems for machine tools are limited in their ability to allow components from different systems to interoperate effectively, leading to restricted flexibility and compatibility.

Innovation Solution

The measuring system set is designed to be divided into multiple component groups, with each group's components being individually customized to work only with other components within the same group, using coding and electronic addressing for compatibility verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If components are designed to work only with specific components from the same manufacturer, then compatibility and reliability are improved, but adaptability and versatility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent compatibilityVSAvoidsystem flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by encoding components with unique identification parameters (serial numbers, group identifiers) that can be read and compared. This allows the system to dynamically determine compatibility based on parameter matching rather than fixed physical constraints, resolving the contradiction between reliable specific pairing and overall system flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through a verification process where the reading device reads identification parameters from components, compares them against compatibility criteria, and provides feedback on whether the components are compatible. This feedback mechanism enables the system to guide component selection and assembly based on compatibility information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If components are provided with individualization features, then cooperation and interaction are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent interactionVSAvoidcomponent structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical individualization features with a reading device that optically or electronically reads identification parameters (such as codes or labels) on components. This substitution of mechanical complexity with information processing simplifies the physical structure while maintaining the ability to identify and match components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses identification parameters that are essentially information copies or representations of component identity and compatibility characteristics. Rather than requiring unique physical features for each component, the system uses readable codes that copy the essential identification information, reducing manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP3665434B1Measuring system set
Publication Date: 2025.06.11 HEXAGON METROLOGY GMBH
  • EP3665434B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3665434B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is a measuring system set consisting of a number of components, wherein the measuring system set can be sub-divided into at least two measuring-system-set component groups, the components of a first measuring-system-set component group being designed such that they can provide these components of the first measuring-system-set component group with an individual identification, so that the components of the first measuring-system-set component group can then only co-operate with components of this first measuring-system-set component group and not with components of another measuring-system-set component group.