Extrusion Process for Meat-Analogue Texture and Fat Content

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processes for producing meat-analogue food products fail to replicate the appearance, texture, and taste of real meat, and struggle to incorporate desired amounts of oil and fat without compromising texture or requiring additional processing steps, leading to unappealing products with high carbohydrate content.

Innovation Solution

A process involving an extruder barrel fed with 40-70 wt % water and 15-35 wt % plant protein, with liquid oil or fat injected downstream, followed by extrusion through a cooling die, which enhances texturization and reduces the need for starch and flour, allowing for a meat-analogue product with 2-15 wt % oil or fat content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If oil and fat are added to the extruder to achieve desired fat content, then the nutritional profile is improved, but the mechanical shear forces are reduced and fiber structure formation is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefat contentVSAvoidfiber structure formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The extrusion process is designed to establish the fiber structure first through mechanical shear forces, then oil and fat are incorporated in downstream processing or during controlled mixing stages. This preliminary action ensures the structural framework is formed before adding lubricating components that would reduce shear forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The extrusion process is divided into distinct stages: first forming the protein matrix and fiber structure, then separately incorporating oil and fat. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently - the fiber structure is built when shear forces are maximum, and fat is added when the structure is already established.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If starch and flour are used to compensate for reduced shear forces, then the texture is maintained, but the carbohydrate content increases and nutritional value decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetextureVSAvoidcarbohydrate content
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The process optimizes extrusion parameters such as temperature, pressure, and screw speed to maximize shear forces during the critical fiber formation stage. By adjusting these parameters, adequate shear forces are generated without requiring additional starch or flour, thus maintaining texture while minimizing carbohydrate content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite protein formulations that inherently provide better textural properties and structural integrity. These composite materials maintain texture and mouthfeel without requiring high carbohydrate content, allowing the product to achieve desired texture through protein matrix structure rather than starch filler.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If high amounts of carbohydrates are used to achieve desired texture, then the mouth feeling is improved, but the product is perceived as having cereal taste and aroma which is not pleasant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemouth feelingVSAvoidcereal taste and aroma
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The extrusion process uses optimized temperature and pressure parameters to develop desirable textural properties and mouth feeling directly from the protein matrix. This eliminates the need for high carbohydrate content, thereby avoiding the unpleasant cereal taste and aroma that would result from using starch and flour fillers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The process replicates the textural characteristics of meat products through controlled protein extrusion and fiber structure formation. By copying the structural properties of meat fibers rather than using carbohydrate fillers, the product achieves authentic mouth feeling without cereal-like taste or aroma.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process results in a meat-analogue food product that mimics the appearance, texture, and taste of meat, with improved textural attributes and nutritional profiles, increasing consumer appeal while avoiding pasty, mushy, or brittle textures and reducing the negative mouthfeel associated with high starch content.

Implementation Method 1

The mechanical shear forces normally obtained with an extruder to build up the needed fiber structure of a meat-analogue

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear force: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

extruding the mixture through a cooling die

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS11882851B2Process for preparing a meat-analogue food product
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE SA
  • US11882851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for preparing a meat-analogue food product. More specifically, the present invention relates to a process for preparing a meat-analogue food product having the appearance and the texture of meat and also relates to a meat-analogue food product obtained by the process.