Automated Meat Inspection System Using Image Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current meat tracking and grading systems in meat processing plants are inefficient and costly, with manual data collection leading to inconsistencies and high costs, particularly in identifying and preventing condemned meat products like abscessed livers, which result in financial losses due to preventable conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for tracking and analyzing livestock and meat products using a database and image processing to link data points with electronic signatures, enabling automated data collection, analysis, and reporting on the health and quality of organs, allowing for real-time feedback and compliance with regulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual data collection and inspection methods are used, then personnel can collect information at various locations, but the process is costly, time-consuming, and inconsistent due to personnel changes and training variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of information collectionVSAvoidtime for manual inspection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection processes with an automated image gathering system that captures images of organs (livers, lungs, kidneys) as they pass through the production line. The system uses electronic data processing to automatically analyze images and determine organ quality, eliminating the need for manual inspection by personnel and ensuring consistent, objective measurements without time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the organ inspection process to perform its own data collection and analysis functions. The image gathering means automatically captures images, the data processing system automatically analyzes the images to determine organ quality, and the system automatically generates reports - all without requiring external manual intervention, thereby eliminating personnel dependency and ensuring consistent results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated image processing systems are implemented, then data collection efficiency and consistency improve, but system complexity and initial cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of data collectionVSAvoidcomplexity of tracking system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional system where the image gathering means serves multiple purposes: capturing images of different organ types (livers, lungs, kidneys), analyzing various quality parameters, generating inspection reports, and integrating with existing production line tracking systems. This universal approach consolidates multiple functions into a single system, improving productivity while managing complexity through integration rather than proliferation of separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary data processing layer that bridges the image capture hardware and the final quality determination output. The data processing system acts as a mediator that receives raw image data, applies analysis algorithms, and generates standardized quality assessments. This intermediary layer simplifies the overall system architecture by providing a clear separation between data acquisition and data interpretation functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If detailed tracking of each organ is implemented, then identification of condemned products improves, but data management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of organ gradingVSAvoidcomplexity of data management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the organ inspection process into distinct functional components: image capture for each organ type, separate analysis routines for different organ qualities, and individual quality determination for each organ. The system processes livers, lungs, and kidneys through separate but parallel pathways, with each segment handling specific organ types and quality parameters. This segmentation improves reliability by ensuring each organ type receives specialized attention while managing data complexity through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the data processing system continuously monitors image quality and organ characteristics, compares findings against established quality standards, and automatically adjusts analysis parameters if needed. The system provides feedback loops that verify the accuracy of quality determinations and ensure consistent application of grading criteria, thereby improving reliability while maintaining manageable data complexity through automated quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9159126B2System and method for analyzing and processing food product
Publication Date: 2015.10.13 JBS USA FOOD CO
  • US9159126B2 patent drawing
  • US9159126B2 patent drawing
  • US9159126B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described that provide a fast and simple way of processing meat or food products. Information is compiled and analyzed regarding the condition of a carcass, meat product, styling of the meat product and associated tray or package. Information is used in various processes, including determining which further processing steps are required. The information is also stored for future reference and analysis.