Meat Inspection Conveyor With Container ID Rework Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conveyor and inspection systems face challenges in tracking and reworking bulk products, such as meat, that fail inspection parameters without sequential ordering, leading to difficulties in parallel processing and effective identification.

Innovation Solution

A conveyor system with a diversion mechanism and inspection unit captures images of non-conforming products, co-registers them with container ID data, and displays these images at a rework station, allowing for reworking and reintroduction into the system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If bulk meat products are transported on a conveyor for inspection without packaging, then inspection accessibility is improved, but product identification and tracking capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accessibilityVSAvoidproduct identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the identification process by assigning unique container IDs to individual containers holding bulk meat products. Each container acts as an independent identification unit, allowing tracking without requiring the meat itself to be packaged or individually identified. The reader scans container IDs at various points in the conveyor system to maintain product identification throughout the inspection and rework process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If rejected products are diverted from the main conveyor for rework, then quality assurance is improved, but product tracking capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assuranceVSAvoidproduct tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by co-registering images of rejected products with their container ID data. When a product fails inspection, the system captures an image, retrieves the container ID via the reader, and links these pieces of information together. This feedback loop ensures that even when products are diverted from the main conveyor, their identity and inspection history are preserved and can be traced through the rework process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If sequential ordering is implemented for bulk product inspection, then product tracking is improved, but processing efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct trackingVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The container ID system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it identifies the bulk product, tracks its movement through the conveyor system, associates inspection results with the correct product batch, and enables rework tracking. This universal identification approach eliminates the need for separate sequential ordering mechanisms, maintaining product tracking capability while allowing parallel processing and improving overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If multiple rework stations operate in parallel, then productivity is improved, but product identification complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparallel processingVSAvoididentification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses image copying to document rejected products. When a product fails inspection, an image is captured and co-registered with the container ID. These image copies are stored and can be displayed at any number of rework stations, allowing multiple stations to operate in parallel without increasing identification complexity. Each station receives the same identification information through the container ID system, eliminating the need for complex multi-channel identification mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables continuous operation with tracked and reworked products, facilitating parallel processing and effective identification of defects, enhancing operational flexibility and quality assurance.

Implementation Method 1

an optical camera

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

x-ray unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray penetration: X-Ray

Implementation Method 3

infrared unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation: Infrared Radiation

Data Source

PatentEP4038539B1Meat inspection
Publication Date: 2026.02.18 METTLER-TOLEDO LLC
  • EP4038539B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4038539B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4038539B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is a conveyor system (100) including a first conveyor (102 leading to an inspection point, the first conveyor (102) including a diversion mechanism configured to divert an object based on failing to meet an inspection parameter. The system (100) includes a second conveyor (108) configured to transport a container (110) configured to receive the object from the diversion mechanism. A control module (112) is configured to co-register an image of the object captured at the inspection point with container ID (204) data of the container.