Meat Shredder With Interleaving Rotors And Pegs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing meat shredding machines often leave chunks of meat unshredded, requiring multiple passes or manual finishing to achieve the desired texture, which increases food preparation time and reduces efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A meat shredding apparatus with a clamshell hopper and rotating rotor assemblies featuring stainless steel pegs and fingers, where the pegs and fingers interleave to provide a tearing action from non-aligned angles, ensuring thorough shredding with a combination of stationary and moving components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional meat shredding machines use simple rotor designs, then the device complexity is reduced, but the shredding completeness deteriorates leaving chunks of meat unshredded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshredder structureVSAvoidshredding completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shredding system is segmented into multiple functional components: upper and lower rotor assemblies with fingers, stationary pegs on front and back walls, arranged in specific vertical spacings. This segmentation allows each component to contribute to different aspects of the shredding action, achieving thorough shredding without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces vertical spacing dimensions between rotor assemblies and pegs (0.75 inch spacing specified) to create a three-dimensional shredding zone. This dimensional approach allows meat to be shredded from multiple angles and positions simultaneously, improving completeness while maintaining reasonable device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple passes through the shredder are used to achieve complete shredding, then the shredding completeness improves, but the food preparation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshredding completenessVSAvoidfood preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The shredding system performs continuous shredding action in a single pass through the combination of rotating rotor assemblies with fingers and stationary pegs arranged in multiple rows. The meat product continuously engages with both moving and stationary elements, ensuring complete shredding occurs during one continuous operation rather than requiring multiple discrete passes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The shredding process is segmented into multiple simultaneous actions: upper rotor shredding, lower rotor shredding, front wall peg action, and back wall peg action all occurring concurrently in a single pass, achieving what would otherwise require multiple sequential passes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If the hopper structure is made fixed and sealed, then the cleaning accessibility deteriorates, but the operational hygiene improves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning accessibilityVSAvoidoperational hygiene
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The hopper back wall is designed to rotate between a closed operational position and an open cleaning position. This dynamic configuration allows the hopper to maintain hygiene during operation while providing easy access for cleaning when needed, resolving the contradiction between sealed structure and cleaning accessibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus efficiently shreds meat in a single pass, reducing preparation time and eliminating the need for manual finishing, while being easy to operate and clean, with the unique peg and finger arrangement providing optimal shredding force and texture.

Implementation Method 1

The product to be shredded is dropped into the shredding region where the clockwise-rotating upper rotor assembly pushes the product into the upper back row of pegs. This action mostly shreds the product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

The meat is shredded by a combination of stationary stainless steel pegs and the moving stainless steel fingers within the shredding region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS9775360B2Meat shredder
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 SOMERSET INDS
  • US9775360B2 patent drawing
  • US9775360B2 patent drawing
  • US9775360B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for shredding meat with a hopper and a frame. The hopper has upper and lower rotor assemblies mounted to rotate horizontally within a shredding region. Each rotor assembly is composed of an arbor and fingers arranged in paraxial rows around the arbor. Four rows of pegs extend horizontally into the shredding region. A front row and a back row are each 0.75 inch above and below, respectively, the upper rotor assembly. A back row and a front row are each 0.75 inch above and below, respectively the lower rotor assembly. The hopper is suspended in the frame, which houses the drive mechanism that rotates the rotor assemblies in opposite directions. The upper rotor assembly pushes product dropped into the shredding region into the upper back row to shred the product. The lower rotor assembly pushes the shredded product into the lower front row to further shred the product.