Mechanical Arm Robust Optimization Using Bounded Beta Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robust optimization design methods for mechanical arms fail to accurately account for hybrid interval and probabilistic uncertainties, leading to unreliable results due to irrational descriptions of uncertainties and subjective weight factor selections, which affect the loading capacity and working efficiency of mechanical arms.

Innovation Solution

A robust optimization design method for mechanical arms based on hybrid interval and bounded probabilistic uncertainties using a generalized beta distribution to describe probabilistic uncertainties, combined with a genetic algorithm and multi-layered refining Latin hypercube sampling for robustness analysis, to accurately reflect uncertainty distributions and prevent model transformation errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If normal distribution is used to describe probabilistic uncertainty, then the mathematical model is simple, but the description becomes irrational and inconsistent with engineering reality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoiduncertainty description accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the distribution parameters from unbounded normal distribution to bounded beta distribution, transforming the uncertainty description to match engineering reality where parameters have finite bounds. This resolves the contradiction by modifying the mathematical parameters to reflect physical constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of forcing engineering uncertainties into normal distribution, the patent inverts the approach by using beta distribution that naturally accommodates bounded uncertainties, making the mathematics serve the engineering reality rather than vice versa.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of manufacture

If 6σ robust design criterion with weight factor is used to transform uncertain objective performance function, then the model transformation is achieved, but errors are incurred and results become unreliable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel transformation feasibilityVSAvoidrobustness assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the problematic weight factor and 6σ transformation from the model, directly optimizing the uncertain objective performance function without intermediate transformations that introduce errors and subjectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes the 6σ criterion as an intermediary transformation step, allowing direct optimization of the original uncertain function, thereby eliminating the error-introducing mediation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If Monte Carlo simulation with conventional sampling method is used for robustness analysis, then the analysis is conducted, but the distribution characteristics of probabilistic uncertainty are not fully reflected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis efficiencyVSAvoidrobustness analysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary stratification of the sampling domain based on the beta distribution characteristics before sampling, pre-organizing the sample space to ensure better coverage of high-contribution regions, thereby improving both accuracy and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the sampling domain into multiple layers with different sampling densities, concentrating more samples in regions of higher contribution to the robustness metric, thereby efficiently capturing the distribution characteristics without excessive computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If sampling points are uniformly distributed in Monte Carlo simulation, then the sampling is simple, but insufficient samples are provided in high-contribution domains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling simplicityVSAvoidrobustness assessment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-stratifies the sampling domain according to the beta distribution characteristics before generating samples, preparing the sampling framework in advance to ensure high-contribution regions receive adequate sample coverage while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different sampling densities to different regions of the domain, providing higher sampling density in high-contribution regions and lower density in low-contribution regions, thereby optimizing the distribution of sampling effort across the domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250094668A1Robust optimization design method for mechanical arm based on hybrid interval and bounded probabilistic uncertainties
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 ZHEJIANG UNIV
  • US20250094668A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094668A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094668A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robust optimization design method for a mechanical arm considering hybrid interval and bounded probabilistic uncertainties is provided. The method includes considering interval and bounded probabilistic uncertainties affecting a performance of a mechanical arm, describing a bounded probabilistic uncertainty by a generalized beta distributed random variable, and establishing a robust optimization design model of the mechanical arm; directly solving the optimization model based on a genetic algorithm, which includes analyzing, by the boundedness of the uncertainties, the robustness of a constraint performance function of an individual in a population, and determining whether the individual is feasible; calculating, a mean and a standard deviation of an objective function of a feasible individual by multi-layered refining Latin hypercube sampling (MRLHS); and ranking, according to a total feasibility robustness index and a distance to negative ideal solution (DNIS), individuals in a current population to obtain a robust optimal design of the mechanical arm.