Mounting system for elevating platform
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing elevating platforms are often opaque, reducing visibility for operators and increasing the risk of accidents due to limited visibility, and they rely on adhesive bonding which can fail under load, leading to structural weaknesses.
Innovation Solution
The use of transparent or translucent materials for platform walls, panels, and doors, along with externally-applied reinforcement ribs and a mounting system that transforms tension stress into shear stress, providing enhanced visibility and structural integrity without relying on adhesive bonding.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Strength
If opaque materials are used for platform walls, then structural strength is improved, but operator visibility deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The platform walls are constructed with locally transparent or translucent sections rather than entirely opaque materials. This allows specific areas to provide visibility while maintaining overall structural integrity through strategically placed transparent panels that can be reinforced at connection points.
Solution Approach 2:
The platform employs composite construction combining transparent or translucent materials with opaque structural elements. The transparent sections provide visibility while the opaque sections maintain structural strength, creating a hybrid system that resolves the contradiction between visibility and strength requirements.
2Ease of manufacture
If adhesive bonding is used for mounting components, then ease of installation is improved, but reliability under load deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The mounting system divides the attachment function into separate mechanical interlock components rather than relying on a single adhesive bond. The mounting plate includes distinct features such as tabs, slots, and interlocking elements that distribute the load across multiple mechanical contact points, eliminating reliance on adhesive bonding for structural support.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces the chemical bonding mechanism (adhesive) with a mechanical bonding mechanism (interlocks). The mounting plate uses physical interlocking features such as tabs fitting into slots, friction-fit components, and mechanically anchored connections that provide reliable load-bearing capacity without depending on adhesive strength.
3Device complexity
If mounting plates are secured with adhesive bonding, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but structural integrity under tension deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
Instead of using adhesive to create tension resistance, the mounting plate design inverts the approach by using mechanical interlocks where the geometry of the components themselves resists tensile forces. The tabs and slots are shaped to convert tension loads into compressive forces or shear forces that the mechanical structure can better withstand.
Solution Approach 2:
The chemical bonding system (adhesive) is replaced with a mechanical bonding system that provides superior tension resistance through physical interlocking. The mounting plate features mechanically anchored connections that maintain structural integrity under tension without requiring adhesive bonding.
Data Source
AI summary
Mounting plates for elevating platforms, including a mounting plate with interior and exterior reinforcement pieces elongated vertically and with rounded corners; a single-piece mounting plate inserted through slots in the platform wall; and a single-piece mounting plate with top and side tabs that wrap around the platform exterior to transform tension stress into shear stress.