Mechanical Intrusion Indication Segment for Chassis Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data center and computing environments lack effective mechanisms to detect unauthorized physical access and tampering with electronic devices mounted in chassis, posing a security risk as operators may not be aware of intrusions.

Innovation Solution

Incorporation of a mechanical intrusion indication segment within electronic devices that moves from a retracted to an extended position upon mounting and engages with the chassis, breaking upon removal to indicate unauthorized access, combined with an intrusion cartridge and actuation mechanism activated by power or signal, allowing detection of tampering attempts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If no intrusion detection mechanism is provided, then the device structure remains simple, but security against unauthorized physical access cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity detection capabilityVSAvoidintrusion indication mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex electronic intrusion detection systems with a simple mechanical indication segment that physically extends and breaks upon unauthorized removal, providing reliable intrusion detection through mechanical means rather than electronic sensors or monitoring systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The intrusion indication segment changes its physical state from retracted to extended (analogous to color change in providing visual feedback), where the extended position indicates normal operation and the broken state indicates intrusion, providing clear visual security status without complex electronics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

2Reliability

If a mechanical intrusion indication segment is added, then intrusion detection capability is improved, but the device structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintrusion detection reliabilityVSAvoidmechanical segment structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The intrusion indication functionality is extracted as a separate, dedicated mechanical segment within the housing, isolated from the main device structure. This modular approach provides reliable intrusion detection while keeping the added complexity contained and manageable within a specific component rather than throughout the entire device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The intrusion indication segment is designed as a simple, sacrificial mechanical element that breaks upon intrusion. This disposable-like component provides high reliability for detection purposes, accepting that the indication mechanism itself is consumed or damaged during the intrusion event, thereby simplifying the overall structure while maintaining detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS12054969B2Mechanical intrusion indication
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US12054969B2 patent drawing
  • US12054969B2 patent drawing
  • US12054969B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, an electronic device for mounting in a chassis includes a housing to be received in the chassis, and a mechanical intrusion indication segment to move from a retracted position to an extended position responsive to mounting of the housing in the electronic device. The mechanical intrusion indication segment when in the extended position is to break upon removal of the housing from the chassis. A controller is to detect an intrusion of the electronic device in response to breaking of the mechanical intrusion indication segment.