Mechanical Linkage Engine Braking with Lash Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing engine braking systems are limited by high complexity, cost, and incompatibility with smaller engines, requiring redesign of engine components, and are not easily retrofittable to existing engines, with hydraulic systems experiencing compliance issues and noise problems.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical linkage-based engine braking apparatus that modifies the existing valve lift to create a bleeder type engine brake, using rotatable, slidable, and ball-locking devices to transmit braking force without high compliance, allowing for installation on all engine types and retrofitting to existing engines, with a braking valve lash adjusting mechanism to reduce manufacturing tolerance requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydraulic circuits are used to transmit mechanical input to exhaust valves for engine braking, then engine braking function is achieved, but system complexity and compliance issues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine braking reliabilityVSAvoidhydraulic circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces hydraulic circuits with a direct mechanical linkage system. A pushrod mechanically connects the fuel injector rocker arm to the exhaust valve, eliminating hydraulic fluid transmission. This mechanical substitution resolves compliance issues inherent in hydraulic systems while reducing overall system complexity by removing hydraulic components such as master pistons, slave pistons, and fluid circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the hydraulic circuit components from the engine braking system. By eliminating the master piston, slave piston, and hydraulic fluid transmission path, the design achieves engine braking through direct mechanical action alone, thereby reducing system complexity and eliminating compliance-related reliability issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If dedicated cam or valve train modifications are made for engine braking, then engine braking performance is improved, but manufacturing cost and incompatibility with existing engines increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine braking performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and retrofitability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the engine braking system universal by utilizing existing engine components for multiple functions. The fuel injector rocker arm serves both its normal function and as the actuator for engine braking. The exhaust valve serves both normal exhaust function and as the braking valve. This multi-functionality allows the system to be retrofitted to existing engines without dedicated cam modifications or specialized valve trains, thereby reducing manufacturing cost and improving compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the existing engine components to serve themselves for engine braking. The fuel injector rocker arm's existing motion during normal operation is harnessed to actuate the exhaust valve for braking without requiring separate actuation mechanisms. This self-service approach eliminates the need for dedicated braking components, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If mechanical linkage with ball-locking devices is used to transmit braking force, then compliance issues are eliminated, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking force transmission reliabilityVSAvoidmechanical linkage complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies ball-locking devices selectively at critical points in the mechanical linkage where force transmission reliability is most needed, rather than throughout the entire system. The balls lock the pushrod to the rocker arm at the point of maximum force transmission, providing reliability only where necessary. This partial application eliminates compliance issues at critical interfaces while minimizing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Manufacturing precision

If braking valve lash adjustment mechanism is added, then manufacturing tolerance requirements are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve lift toleranceVSAvoidlash adjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a pre-adjusted mechanical linkage system where the pushrod length and ball-locking position are predetermined during manufacturing to provide the correct valve lash. This preliminary action of setting the geometry during production eliminates the need for complex field-adjustable mechanisms, thereby reducing manufacturing tolerance requirements while minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7909017B2Engine braking apparatus with mechanical linkage and lash adjustment
Publication Date: 2011.03.22 JACOBS VEHICLE SYSTEMS INC
  • US7909017B2 patent drawing
  • US7909017B2 patent drawing
  • US7909017B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus for modifying engine valve lift to produce an engine valve event in an internal combustion engine, the engine including at least one exhaust valve and an exhaust valve lifter for cyclically opening and closing the at least one exhaust valve, includes (a) an actuator for operating the at least one exhaust valve to produce said modified engine valve lift, said actuator having an inoperative position and an operative position; in said inoperative position said actuator being disengaged from the operation of the at least one exhaust valve, and in said operative position said actuator opening the at least one exhaust valve for said engine valve event; and (b) a controller for moving said actuator between said inoperative position and said operative position.